|
.� a .A 1
<br /> � Item#11-CC.4genda-12/11/06
<br /> File#06-3?34/35[Total Pages 94J
<br /> significantly,which would cause the apE�licant to lose even more time. Rahn inquired whether the City
<br /> Engineer has had an opport.mity to review the cevised plans.
<br /> �
<br /> ��-�;su ��.��
<br /> Curtis stated to her knowledge the city engineer has not reviewed�the reu�sed�.plans.
<br /> . . ti�� v�y�:����������.. .
<br /> Kroeger expressed doubt that the City Council would approve 41 peiceiit liardcover for this lot,
<br /> + � �:t* i,.� �,�ar����
<br /> ��*�; ���l.x��c�E�?a�������.h
<br /> Kempf concurred that the City Engineer sl�ould revie�v�tTi�e�pla�,1n�.s;�r orito t11e���tysCo�unc'i�l�rev�ewing it.
<br /> �t�+";ix;�""��`�.��'w. ,�E���'�Ii'3*t�'�`?��:�-;'
<br /> �+�-5���'�`��rli �;'�slzx��,�r�" �7ur (�.�:
<br /> Hessburg stated he is agreeable to working witll the C�ty�Engii}eer,;,�. `;����.��z?�����j
<br /> �1Z�`µ,�4��xjTi' ���~7 t� . "'Yi{u:i.i�"
<br /> �n �n�k 7t,R':t���S�f.'r,�
<br /> Bremer stated the problem the Planning Commission has�wi'th tlie"a��lication is that there are a number of
<br /> ��;,G�-����.``,���"
<br /> .
<br /> ��'��`.��,z�.'w��
<br /> issues that have not been finalized, such as the dratnage aud the hardcov�erx andathat these issues should be
<br /> �,�w�� �.r.�.��.ts '��,r�m,�+�t*��,e..
<br /> xc�fi... 2�t u� -y�r -�..l,u"t .
<br /> �R ��.�c�t{��f���Y.J vYy���k. � .
<br /> resolved prior to the application proceeding forv�a`rd-to�he Couuc�l.
<br /> ���, '� �-� -, ��,�,�
<br /> ��,��k�`,f i��,"��f`;����`��M r,�s u,�.
<br /> Hessberg reGuested the Pla��ning Comm�sst�orirp��rovide�js��.Qme guic�an.ce on�;�he hardcover for the larger lot.
<br /> �`��;�f.�r.t�' 'F xYN"� �"L�°�A`��7�� • .
<br /> �-�� �^;�� �r��r�� �
<br /> Hessburg noted his purcl�ase ageemeiit�,�s contingent�ou the CtLy C`�ouucil approving his proposal for the
<br /> ���� n �:
<br /> �,x �;� �� ��
<br /> t�`-�r�'�,��,�,�=�' 4��;�,,�����'��
<br /> two lots. Hessburg stated the p�rob�e��wrth the iwo-story�s,5ahe�tlier he can get 50 percent of the
<br /> . . �rJT.��.�`.C�,e�,�-; s`� �r':�... . �
<br /> ;"t��.,�.��"�;' �^�a�"�^'M
<br /> foundatiou below grade. '�z x���.:��{�-�+.
<br /> x ,� �a';�r�
<br /> � ����������At
<br /> 'ra�"'�.,�is%Y x `a t*-��.s�,'i�
<br /> Curtis stated s,�he�hhas�not conducted an��analysis to determine whether the revised plans would comply with
<br /> t.r����n,y",�1'z���is'�,��' �5*��s, �k��4uw'��.�h�,,y�'``�"h`L''y
<br /> +r�.7r'jaw'�xtpFG''�i }t�I`��.:✓��'�h;,^�-����? "4�'�.r,{'A'"2.%y i".�. .
<br /> tI�e City s�pr,oposed�zon�ng�,eodeF�aniendment�on de�mtions of basement and story.
<br /> �',�,�w'�, 4 �t'����'x���� �tu.��4r,.
<br /> ��f�� �'ti�`�a��a'��a,'�
<br /> R��stated he would feel moY;e6com�ortable approving tlie application ifthe City Engineer has made
<br /> �,�L��� �w���
<br /> ����������� �������;
<br /> some�reconunendations on these,�lans;��
<br /> ��`a�,��r��,�l ������"`���
<br /> ��� ti�� �:� ��a��'�"'=
<br /> Hessburgk;mc�uirecl�if the Planntng.�Gomntission could provide him with a number that the hardcover
<br /> `t�-���+���z�� ����,���;�.
<br /> �r e�;"��E�j r`ti��'i� k1��,�'$r^�t �'
<br /> should be redueed�to-�'�",��.;��,�
<br /> �`����.�s��,����°`
<br /> �sy��,�,�1�
<br /> Sansevere stated ui l�tsuvieyv.;tlie Plairning Commission has given the applicant good guidance on how his
<br /> .�if,�r
<br /> plans should be revised and that it is difficult for the Planning Conimission to give someone a de�uite
<br /> number on tlie hardcover that would be allowed on a lot. .
<br /> Bremer suggested the applicalit table his application to continue to work witll staff.oii his proposal.
<br /> Bremer opened the public hearing at 7:05 �.m.
<br />
|