Laserfiche WebLink
Mike Gaffron <br /> From: Mike Gaffron <br /> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 1:00 PM <br /> To: 'mattw@PioneerEng.com' <br /> Cc: Christine Mattson; Monica Fadness <br /> Subject: 758 Bridgewater Drive- Building Location Parameters <br /> Attachments: 758 Bridgewater-Combined Site Airphoto.doc; 758 Bridgewater- Unbuildable portions <br /> highlighted.pdf; Buildability Diagrams-755 &756 Brdgwtr&763 Boulder.pdf; Buildabiliry& <br /> Landscaping.pdf; Stonebay Covenant Excerpt re Encroachments.pdf; 764 Bridgewater survey <br /> excerpt.pdf <br /> Matt— <br /> First, I assume you are aware that this parcel started out as two lots (Lots 16 and 17)that have been combined <br /> due to the difficulties associated with meeting setbacks for Lot 17. The two lots were formerly addressed as <br /> 756 (Lot 17) and 758 (Lot 16). Combined, they are addressed as 758. <br /> The following is an excerpt from an email to Matt Juvrud of Wooddale Builders in December 2013 regarding <br /> Lot 17. It references a series of overlay sheets which are attached as "Buildability Diagrams": <br /> 756 Bridgewater (Lot 17, Block 1,4th Add, shown on some views as Lot 21): <br /> 1) The lot is functionally 40' wide. The house proposed is 38'wide. This leaves a 2' gap between house <br /> and south lot line. <br /> 2) That 2' gap is supposed to be planted and maintained as wetland buffer.The house can't be widened <br /> to 40'. <br /> 3) The SW corner of the lot has an area of standard 25' wetland buffer as depicted in Sheet 2. That area <br /> of the lot can't be built on. It has a detrimental effect on the driveway, which is tapered to avoid the <br /> buffer as well as meet the 26' city wetland setback. <br /> 4) South of the house,the City setback remains at 26' but a setback encroachment was allowed along <br /> the east half of the south wall of the house, per Sheet 3. <br /> 5) The area south of the south wall of the house but north of the standard 16'-25' MCWD buffer is an <br /> area of replacement buffer. This is depicted on the Buildability& Landscaping attachment as <br /> extending to the wall of the house, and cannot be built on; functionally it means the south 2' of lot <br /> 17 can't be built on. <br /> 6) The MCWD buffer at 16' is measured from the replacement wetland as shown on Sheet 5. <br /> 7) The sum of the limitations on this lot leaves almost no flexibility, and yields what might become an <br /> awkward driveway abutting a rock wall that drops off at the edge of the driveway. And not much <br /> room to extend the house eastward. <br /> Based on the above, Wooddale chose to combine the two lots. To summarize the setback and other <br /> parameters for the combined lot, I would offer this: <br /> 1. There are no lot line setback requirements as such for any of the Stonebay individual <br /> lots. Absent other limitations such as wetland buffers, etc., the individual pads in the Stonebay <br /> development can be fully developed with no hardcover or structural coverage percentage <br /> limitations. <br /> 2. The allowable encroachments outside the individual lot boundaries are listed in the <br /> development covenants, Item 5.10, page 15 (attached). <br /> � <br />