My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-28-1986 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1986
>
07-28-1986 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/8/2012 5:01:57 PM
Creation date
8/8/2012 5:01:57 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 28, 1986 <br />#1050 THOMAS R. BROWNE <br />760 BROWN ROAD SOUTH <br />VARIANCE <br />RESOLUTION #2027 <br />Thomas R. Browne was present for this matter. <br />City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for <br />a front yard setback variance to construct an addition <br />to replace an existing porch and construct an attached <br />garage. He noted that applicant is changing the <br />driveway access layout which staff finds acceptable. <br />Planning Commission recommended approval. <br />It was moved by Councilmember Grabek, seconded by <br />Councilmember Adams, to adopt Resolution #2027 approving <br />the variance as presented. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. <br />11054 STEVEN SCHNEBLY <br />2555 COUNTRYSIDE DRIVE <br />VARIANCE <br />RESOLUTION . #2028 <br />Steven Schnebly was present for this matter. <br />City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request <br />for after - the -fact variances to permit the construction <br />of masonry walls flanking his driveway entrance which <br />exceed the 42" maximum height allowance and require a <br />variance because they are structure within a front yard <br />area. <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that the <br />Planning Commission voted 3 -2 to approve the request, <br />with the minority opinion being that a similar type of <br />structure was recently disapproved on Brackett's Point <br />(Pillsbury serpentine wall) and approval of the <br />Countryside Drive application would be inconsistent. <br />Staff differentiates this application from the Pillsbury <br />application in that it is essentially two pillars rather <br />than a continuous wall. <br />In response to the question by Mayor Butler, Mr. <br />Schnebly stated that he did not plan to put anything on <br />top of the entrance pillars. <br />It was moved by Councilmember Grabek, seconded by <br />Councilmember Adams, to adopt Resolution #2028 granting <br />the after - the -fact variances as presented. Motion, Ayes <br />3, Nays 0. <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.