Laserfiche WebLink
FILE#16-3799 <br /> January 13,2016 <br /> Page 8 of 8 <br /> issues for Consideratfon <br /> 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the <br /> praperty in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an officia! control? <br /> 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variances, if granted, will not alter the <br /> essential character of the neighborhood? <br /> 3. If the Planning Commission concludes that the variances as requested or fn some <br /> other manner or configuration are justified, does the Commission find it necessary <br /> ta impose conciitions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the <br /> variances? <br /> 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br /> StafF Recommendation <br /> If Planning Commissian determines that tne practical difficulties test is met and the variances are <br /> justified, then a recommendation for approval may be in order. If Planning Corr�mission #inds <br /> that the practical difficulties test is not met, a recammendation for denial, or tabling for <br /> revisians, may be appropriate. Options for actfon include: <br /> 1) Recommend approval (with or without specific conditions). If approval is recommended, <br /> specific conditions may include: <br /> - Require gutter�to handle roof runoff <br /> - Relocate sewage ejector tank top meet required setback <br /> 2) Recommend denial, stating reasons. <br /> 3} Table for further information or revisions — specif}r what information or changes are <br /> desired. <br /> 4) Other. <br />