My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-16-2016 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2016
>
02-16-2016 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2019 2:23:27 PM
Creation date
8/25/2016 9:13:01 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
356
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. NIINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMIVIISSION MEETING PC Exhibit E <br /> Tuesday,January 1.9,2016 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Curtis indicated that is correct. � <br /> 3 �, <br /> `��-�. <br /> Michael Rucinski,A licant, stated he has nothing to add to Staffls report. <s -•�� <br /> � <br /> Chair Leskinen opened the p lic hearing at 6:58 p.m. <br /> There wete no public comrnents regar ' g this appiication. <br /> Chair Leskinen closed the public hearing at 6: p. . <br /> Leskinen stated the applica.tion is fairly s ' t forwar d that the proposed garage is being constructed <br /> within the same footprint and location the e�cisting garag . The only difference is the roof. <br /> Schwingler moved,Landgr er seconded,to recommend apprnv of Application No. 16-3798, <br /> Michael and Hoily Ru ' ski,31$8 North Shore Drive,granting of a riance aubject to Staff s <br /> recommendation. TE:Ayes 6,Nays 0. <br /> 5. #16-3799 INTEGRITY REMODELING &DESIGN GROUP ON BEHALF OF <br /> MATTSER'AND JAMIE HANSON,2060 SPATES AVENUE,VARIANCES,7:00 P.M.—7:30 <br /> P.M. <br /> Rick Topalof, Integrity Remodeling,was presen� <br /> Gaffron stated the applicant is requesting frontlstreet and side setback variances in order to construct a <br /> covered open porch on an existing nonconforming accessory building located nearer the s�reet than the <br /> pz�incipal residence structure, The proposal also requires variances for individual and total accessory � <br /> structure footprint areas since t�e addition converts the building's status to that of an oversize accessary <br /> structure. <br /> The addition to the building expands its footprint to approximabely 47' x 27' or 1,262 square feet,maldng <br /> it an aversized accessory structure. Under Zoning Code Section 78-1434 regarding accessory structure <br /> footprir�t area,and since no oversize accessory structures are allowed on lots less than 2.0 acres,the <br /> Page 8 of 45 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.