Laserfiche WebLink
FILE�16-3799 , <br /> February 11,2016 <br /> Pege 6 of 6 <br /> 3. If the P{anning Commission concludes that the �ariances as requested ar in some <br /> other manner or configuration are justified, daes the Commission find (t necessary <br /> to impase conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the <br /> variances7 <br /> 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application7 <br /> Staff Recommertdatlon <br /> If Planning Comrrtission determines that the practical difficulties test is met and the va�iances are <br /> justified for the revised pian, then a recomrr�endation for approval may be in order. If Planning <br /> Commission finds that the practical difficulties test is not met, a recommendation for denial, or <br /> tabling for revisions,may be approprfate. Options for action include: <br /> 1) Rernmmend approval (with or without specific conditions). If approval is recommended, <br /> specific conditions may include: <br /> - Require gutters to handle roof runoff <br /> 2) Recommend denial,stating reasons. <br /> 3) Table for further information or revisions — specify what information or changes are <br /> desired. <br /> 4) Other. <br />