Laserfiche WebLink
FILE#15-3759 <br /> J <br /> 16 February 2016 <br /> Page 2 of 2 <br /> by the Sherriff and the City is lacking in effectiveness. <br /> Linda Malaski, 1925 Concordia, noted her contracts with renters are stricter than <br /> the cities proposed regulations. <br /> Jenny Carter, 2780 Shadywood, former inn keeper, rents a room in her house <br /> and she is more stringent that the proposed ordinance. Does have a concern <br /> with minimum stays. She wants the City to understand that haw this industry is <br /> regulated says a lot about the city. Are people stranger, or merely visitors. She <br /> noted the VBRO rates guests, and that information can be used by the renter to <br /> determine appropriateness. <br /> Don Driggs owns Deering Island. He does not think the provisian that excludes <br /> non-primary residences be included. He noted that much ofthe �egulation is <br /> already covered by existing laws, and need not be readdressed. <br /> Katherine Kitt, 3fi35 North Shore drive rents her hame, and questioned the <br /> number of issues that are triggering this discussion. She noted that her contract <br /> is stricter than the ordinance. <br /> Janie Heard, 2795 Shadywood Road, requested no changes to the ordinances <br /> already in place, felt they weren't needed <br /> Paul Larson was cancerned that any changes naw couldn't be fully vetted with <br /> the snowbird owners away for the winter. (Letters were sent to property <br /> owners' addresses listed in Hennepin County Records, including California and <br /> Washington �equesting comment.) <br /> Collectively,those speaking suggested provisions#3, 6, 9, 13, be removed. <br /> Exhibit B, Comparison of Provisions is intended to provide commentary regarding the <br /> respond to comments stating#hat the regarding the code already addresses some of the <br /> issues. Items in italics are already addressed in the city code. <br /> Exhibit C represents the letters received to date, for and against the proposed <br /> ordinance. <br /> The Planning Commission is asked to campfete one of the folaowing actions: <br /> 1. Recommend approval of the ordinance as presented <br /> 2. Recommend approval of the ordinance with changes <br /> 3. Table action, directing staff to complete specific research. <br />