Laserfiche WebLink
. � �� <br /> 0 0 <br /> CITY of ORONU <br /> a � <br /> � <br /> �`�,� ��'� RESOLUTION O�F T�H5C31TY COUNCIL <br /> 9kE8I'iO4� N O. <br /> WHERIEAS, Lots 1-4 and Scatch Pine Lane will be reglatteci into three building <br /> lots and a private driveway outlot, with Iot areas as follows: <br /> Proposed Lot 1 = 1.13 acres (Marfield) <br /> Proposed Lot 2 = 0.85 acres (Hill) <br /> Proposed Lat 3 = 1.34 acres (± 0.96 acres dry) (Tales) <br /> Outiot A = 0.05 acres; and <br /> WHEREAS, as a resuit of the replat, each of the three proposed lots increases in <br /> � acreage gazned from the vacation of Scotch Pine L.ane, an� in t�ie case �f pro�o�ed I,c�t 2, alsc� <br /> resuitin�from the addition of�area incorporated within tYie existin� Lc�t 2. Each of pmpused I.ots <br /> 1; 2 and 3 will, however, remain at iat�reas less than the requirecl two acre?xinintiim for t�e �K- <br /> lA Zo�u�g District, rec}uiring a lot area variance; and <br /> VF'HEREAS, each of proposed Lots 1, 2 and 3 are lakeshore lots but lack the <br /> req�ired 200' Iot v��idth at the shoreline and at the 75' lakeshore setback Iine a� r�quired in the L�Z- <br /> lA district, requiri.ng lot width variances for each of Lots 1, 2 and 3; and <br /> vt'I�REA.S, proposed Lots 2 and 3 both abut North Shore Drive, a glatted County <br /> road. Proposed Lot 1 as a result of the replat witl no longer abut a p•�blic roadway, but will gain <br /> access via a shared driveway serving progosed L,ots 1 and 2 withi.n proposed Outlot A. By <br /> defanition, praposed Lot 1 is a "back lot" per Municipal Subdivision Code Section 11.Q3, <br /> Subdivision 2. Per Section 11.31, Subdivision 5 (C-2), proposed Lot 1 is ret�uired to meet 150% <br /> of the two acre zoning district lot area requirement; is required to meet the 200' lot width <br /> requirement at the shoreline, at the lakeshore setback line, and at the street yard setback line; is <br /> subject to a street }•ard or front yard depth of 15Q% of the 50' front yard requirement of the I.,R- <br /> lA district; and is subject to a side yard depth of 150% of the 30' LR-lA side yazd requirement; <br /> and <br /> «'I�REAS, as a result of the replat, the Marfield property (proposed Lot 1) <br /> becomes a back ]ot with 45' rec}uired side setbacks rather than the 30' side setbacks normally <br /> required in the LR-1 A district, making more of Marfield's residence structure non-conforming <br /> to the side setback requirements. Similarly, the Hill properiy (proposed Lot 2) becomes a front <br /> lat subject to a �0' side street setback along Outlot A, and 30' side setback along the camrnon <br /> boundary line ���ith proposed Lot 1. The replat results in revised setback requirements <br /> itnpacting proposed Lots 1, 2 and 3, which must be taken into account in future i�npzovements <br /> ta thase properties; <br /> Page 2 of 6 <br />