Laserfiche WebLink
� 1VIINiJTES OF THE <br /> URONO PLANNING CONIIVII�SION MEETING <br /> Monday,November 15,20I.5 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Leskinen stated she does not fund a sufficient practical difficulty to warrant attaching the garage. <br /> Leskinen stated she dces understand the existing garage is very close to the road and that she would <br /> entertain the possibility of creating additional backup area to make that situation safer. <br /> 'Fhiesse stated he would like the applicants to consider a detached garage,which should al(ow them to <br /> reduce the hardcover quite a bit. Thiesse stated the extra bituminous for the driveway could be reduced. <br /> Gaffron asked if Commissioner Thiasse would support a new 2-sta.11 garage on the property. Gaf&on <br /> noted the code would require a 30-foot setback from the street. <br /> Thiesse stated he would like ttte applicants to consider that option,which�ould keep the hardcover close <br /> to the existing amounk <br /> Gaffron srtated when you look at the variance that was granted and the survey, it shows the garage with a <br /> long driveway. There was originally a house that was 2.3 feet from the lot line,which was removed,and <br /> a new house was centered an the property. The required hardcover limitations that were placed on the <br /> property did not anticipate having excess bituminous on the side and was never approved. Gaffron stated <br /> the applicants probably wouid be ahle to construct a backup area within the 30 feet to avoid backing out <br /> onto Shadywood. <br /> Thiesse stated he likes the idea but an earlier Council said no. <br /> Gaffron stated the codes have not changed significantly since 1987 and that the City has actually allowed <br /> more hardcover on a lot by considering the entire lot rather than just the 75-250 foot zone. In general all <br /> the setback requirements have not changed since then. <br /> Schcenzeit asked if the numbers being presented today are based on today's code. <br /> Gaffron indicated that is correct. <br /> Schcenzeit noted under current code the applicants would be allowed a 2-foot overhang. <br /> Gai�'ron stated the applicants are proposing a roof over a 3' x 10' entryway that would drain to either <br /> side. Gaffron noted the overhang is extending closer to the neighbor's lot line than the existing <br /> overhangs. Gaffron stated anything that is less than eight feet from the lot line would rec�uire a variance. <br /> �IcCrrann asked if the appIicants would be subject to the same hardcover regulations as the neighboring <br /> properties. <br /> Gaffron stated both of the lots on either side are of different szze but that he dces not know t�ow much <br /> hardcover those lots are allowed or currently have. <br /> Schoenzeit noted the applicant recently pnrchased the house in this aondition and that it is not a hardship. <br /> McCrrann stated it looks like this property rnight have the smallest hardcover percentage in the <br /> neighborhood. <br /> Page 11 af 27 <br />