My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-19-2016 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2016
>
01-19-2016 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:55:13 PM
Creation date
8/24/2016 3:16:36 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
372
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. FILE#16-3801 <br /> Jenuary 11,20'i6 <br /> Page 5 of 5 <br /> the functionality and storage space gained with a 2-stall garage. Angling the garage to be square <br /> with the house rather than square with the street might provide only minimal relief from the <br /> setback encroachments. <br /> The setback variances for the proposed garage are not extreme, and with such a difFicult lot, <br /> unavoidable unless a very narrow and less functianal garage is constructed. <br /> While there is existing vegetative screening of the proposed garage location from Shadywood <br /> Road, and while that is primarily deciduous screening, no variance from the side street setback fs <br /> proposed. <br /> Practical Difftculties Statement <br /> Applicant has completed the Practical Difficulties�ocumentation Form attached as Exhibit D,and <br /> should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. <br /> Nelghbor Comments <br /> As of this writing the City has received no comments from neighboring property owners <br /> Issues for Consideration <br /> 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the <br /> property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? <br /> 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the �arfances, if granted, will not alter the <br /> essentlal character of the neighborhood? <br /> 3. If the Planning Commission concludes that the variances as requested or in some <br /> other manner or configuration are �ustified, does the Commission find it necessary <br /> ta impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the <br /> variances? <br /> 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> Staff recommends approva� of the requested �ariances. If Planning Commission determines that <br /> the practical difficulties test is met and the �ariances are justified, then a recommendatfon for <br /> appro�al would be in order. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.