My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-19-2016 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2016
>
01-19-2016 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:55:13 PM
Creation date
8/24/2016 3:16:36 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
372
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
, #1�38D0 <br /> Jenuary 14,2016 <br /> Pepe 3 of 3 <br /> the easemant exists,and combining it with theiur existing land,continuation of the easement <br /> will bisect their combined parcel and cause potential future issues. <br /> The ability to vacate the easement relies primarily on whether there are existing utilities in <br /> the easement and whether it is over an actual topographi�c drainageway. Neither condition <br /> is apparent; we are waiting for additional word from the public utility companies for <br /> confirmation they have no facilities in the easemen�. <br /> The portion of easement remaining in the MacMillan property will not be vaca.ted.Brooks <br /> has agreed to grant a replacement easement 10' in width along his side of the new lot line, <br /> connecting the existing MacMillan easement next to the pond with the existing 10' D&U <br /> easement that straddles the easterly lot line between Lot� 2 and 3 {see Swvey). <br /> Staff is anticipating hearing from the MnDNR as to whether the art�cial lake abutting the <br /> properties is a `public water'. If so, MnDNR will review the vacation r�quest and make <br /> comments. No objec�ion is anticipated. <br /> City Criteria for Vacation <br /> Zotung Code Section 78-9 governs the vacation of streets, alleys and public grounds. In <br /> past vacation requests,the City has determined that vacation may be appropriate when: <br /> 1. The vacation does not affect access to or use of any adjoining property. <br /> 2. The City has not and does not intend to develop, improve, or use the dedicated <br /> easement. <br /> 3. The easement as it exists serves no public purpose. <br /> It is staff's opinion that these three conditions are applicable to this application. <br /> A review of the City's utility maps indicates there are no City utilities within the easement <br /> azea The public utility c,flmpanies (gas, electric, telephone, cable} have been notified of <br /> the proposal and as of this writing only one has responded(Centerpoint—no objection). <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> Staff recommends approval of the vacation application for the easement as identified in the <br /> attached materials, subject to: <br /> 1} Brooks to granf a replacement 10' D&U easement as showzi in the attached <br /> materials. <br /> 2) The vacation to become effective only upon completion of the administrative lot <br /> line rearxangement and receipt of the replacement easement. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.