Laserfiche WebLink
FILE#16�3799 � <br /> January 13,2096 <br /> Paga 8 of 8 <br /> Issues for Considerativn <br /> 1. Does the Planning Cornmission �nd that that the property owner proposes to use the <br /> property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an o�cial control? <br /> 2. Does the Planning Cammission find that the variances, if granted, will not alter the <br /> essential character of the neighborhood? <br /> 3. If the Planning Commission concludes that the variances as requested or in some <br /> other manner or configuration are Justified, does the Commission find it necessary <br /> ta impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the <br /> variances? <br /> 4. Are there any other issues or concerns witF�this application? <br /> Staff Recvmmendation <br /> If Planning Commission determines that the practical difficulties test is met and the variances are <br /> justified, then a recommendation for approval may be in order. If Planning Commission finds <br /> that the practical difficulties test is not met, a recommendation for denial, or tabling for <br /> revisions, may be appropriate, Options for action include: <br /> 1) Recommend approval (with or withvut specific conditions). If approval is recommended, <br /> specific conditions may include: <br /> - Require gutters to handle roof runoff <br /> - Relocate sewage ejector tank top meet required setback <br /> 2) Recommend denial,stating reasons. <br /> 3) Table for further information or revisions — specify what information or changes are <br /> desired. <br /> 4) Other. <br />