My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-19-2016 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2016
>
01-19-2016 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:55:13 PM
Creation date
8/24/2016 3:16:36 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
372
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
` Agenda Item 5 <br /> , <br /> �.o�a <br /> Date Application Recehred: i2/15/15 <br /> Date Applitation Considered as Complete:12j15/15 � ,, <br /> 60-Day Review Period Expfres: 2/13/16 ye� �: <br /> `�xES}i Oti''�' <br /> To: Chair Lesfcinen and Planning Commission Members <br /> Jessica Loftus, City Administrator <br /> From: Mike Gaffron,Senior Pianner <br /> Oate: January 13, 20�.6 <br /> Subject: #16-3799, Integrity Remodeling& Design Group o/b/o Matt&Jamie Hanson, <br /> 2050 Spates Avenue <br /> Variances <br /> Public Hearing <br /> Appllcatfon Summary: The applicant requests front/street and side setback variances in order <br /> to construct a covered apen porch on an existing nonconfarming accessory building located � <br /> nearer the street than the principa! residence structure. The appiication as presented also <br /> requires variances for individual and total accessory structure footprint areas, as the addition <br /> converts the building's status to that of an Oversize Accessory Structure. <br /> Sta}�Recommendat►on: If Pla�ning Commissian determines that the practical difficulties test <br /> is met and the variances a�e justified, then a recommendation for approval may be in order. <br /> Conversely, if Planning Commission determines that the practical difficulties test is not met, <br /> then a recommendation for denial may be in order. _ � <br /> Zoning District: LR-lA, One Family La�ceshore Residential, 2.0 acres/Z00' min,width <br /> Lot Area/Width: 56,846 s.f. (1.31 acre},49.8'wide at 50'front setback line <br /> List of Exhibits <br /> Exhibit A. Application <br /> Exhibit B. Existing &Proposed SurveyJSite Plan <br /> Exhibit C. Plans&Sketches of Proposed Addition <br /> Exhibit D. Practical Dirfficulties Documentation Form <br /> Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculatians <br /> Exhibit F. Photos <br /> Exhibit G. Plat Map <br /> Exhibit H. Property Owners List <br /> Exhibit I. Adjacent Owners Acknowledgements <br /> Exhibit J. Existing Covenant for Plumbing in Accessory Building(2010) <br /> Background <br /> The applicants have owned the existing residence since 2Q07 and propose ta construct a covered <br /> deck addition to the rear and east sides of the existing 718 s.f. accessory garage/storage building <br /> located near Spates Avenue. The addition consists of a wraparound covered (roofedy deck, <br /> 15'x27' at the rear of the structure and 5'x 33' along the east side. The existing structure is <br /> nonconforming in location, t�eing 1) nearer the front iot line than the existing residence; 2) <br /> located 22' from the street lat iine where a minimum 50' setback would be required for any <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.