Laserfiche WebLink
! � <br /> FILE�55-3795 <br /> 10 Nov 15 <br /> Page 8 at B <br /> that the applicant has proven practical difficulties which support the granting of setback and <br /> hardcover variances to construct the pool in the location proposed. Most recently, the Clty <br /> Council denied a variance for a pool wlthin 75 feet of the lake on long Lake. <br /> Publlc CammerKs <br /> No comments from the public have been received as of the drafting of the staff memo. <br /> Issues for Cons(deratlon <br /> 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the p�operty owner proposes to use the <br /> pr�perty in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? <br /> 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the <br /> essentiaE character of the neighborhood? <br /> 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mltigate the <br /> impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? <br /> 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br /> Planning Staff Recommendation <br /> The Planning Commission should evaluate the practical difFculty criteria against the requested <br /> �ariances and make a recommendation to the City Council. Planning Staff recommends approval <br /> of the variances to allow modifications to/construction o# the decks and pergola. Staff <br /> recommends denial of wetland setback and hardcover variances relating to the pool, retaining <br /> walls, and pool patio. <br />