Laserfiche WebLink
, . <br /> FILE#15-3795 <br /> 12 Jan 16 <br /> Page 5 of 5 <br /> Shoreland regulations. Many ofthe homes surrounding French Lake were constructed prior to the <br /> existence of the 150-foot setback. The home was constructed ±70 feet from the OHWL and ±40 <br /> feet from the wetland at a time when a 26-foot wetland setback was required. The location of <br /> the home and the application of the 26-foot setback would have permitted construction of a pool <br /> or other improvements at that time.The property is large although awkwardly shaped, the home <br /> is approximately 18 feet higher than the lake/wetland level, and the home, existing trees, and <br /> other vegetation offer separation and potentiaily screening from any visual impacts resulting from <br /> the location of the home. The open water area of French Lake is situated more to the north and <br /> east of the subject project area, approximately 420 feet away. The proposed deck additions <br /> provide access from the driveway to the lake side. Staff finds that there are special conditions <br /> relating to the existing home and property which support granting the requested lake setback and <br /> average lakeshore setback variances for the some or all of the deck improvements. Further, the <br /> variance to permit an encroachment into the 10-foot structure to structure separation between <br /> the pool and deck stair is reasonable due to the nature of the deck and the need to reduce the <br /> hardcover near the lake; the pool will be 10 feet from the deck surface. <br /> The proposed pool will be located 4 feet from the pergola and stairs off of the dining deck (10 <br /> feet from the walking surface of the deck); approximately 80 feet lakeward of the average <br /> lakeshore setback line; and entirely within the 150-foot structure setback. <br /> Issues for Consideration <br /> 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the <br /> property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? <br /> 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the <br /> essential character of the neighborhood? <br /> 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the <br /> impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? <br /> 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br /> Planning Staff Recommendation <br /> The Planning Commission should evaluate the practical difficulty criteria against the requested <br /> revised variances and make a recommendation to the City Council. Planning Staff recommends <br /> approval of the variances to allow modifications to/construction of the decks and pergola <br /> lakeward of the average lakeshore and 150-foot lake setback,as well as the variance to allow less <br /> than a 10-foot separation between the deck stairs and the pool. Staff recommends approval of <br /> the portions of the stairs and walls for the lake access, however recommends denial of the <br /> additional hardcover resulting from the paver walkway within the 75-foot setback. <br />