Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,June 20,2016 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Thiesse stated the Park Commission had a public hearing. <br /> Council Member Levang stated the Park Commission went through months of planning regarding the dog <br /> park and that the Park Commission was brought back by Mayor McMillan and herself for the purpose of <br /> shoring up the City's assets in the City. Levang stated the Park Commission has worked tirelessly and <br /> has looked at every park in the City and has taken a number of steps to bring them up to a beautiful <br /> condition. <br /> Levang indicated she also worked with the soccer girls to lay the chips on the trai(s at Lurton Park, which <br /> is a wonderful asset that is not being used. Levang stated the Lurton fami(y asked the City to expand the <br /> use of the park. Levang stated the Park Commission worked hard to identify the needs of the City and the <br /> dog park was one of the needs. Levang stated the Park Commission did their homework and did <br /> everything they were supposed to and that there was no behind closed doors action here. Levang stated <br /> the process has all been transparent and the Park Commission has worked very, very hard to come up <br /> with a good plan. <br /> Levang noted Commissioner Schoenzeit does not have to agree the City needs a dog park and that he was <br /> not asked to weigh in on that. Levang stated it is the responsibility of the City Council to make that <br /> decision. Levang stated the Park Commission worked very hard on this and that she does not appreciate <br /> being told there was some behind closed doors' action when there was none of that. <br /> Bryce Johnson stated the Park Commission worked very hard on this project and spent a lot of time <br /> investigating dog parks independent of anything having to do with Lurton Park. The Park Commission <br /> came to the conclusion that an off-leash dog park was a very important need for Orono and the <br /> community. Johnson stated they had the discussion at a Park Commission meeting that was open to the <br /> public. In addition,the Lurton family approached the City and requested it be used as a dog park. <br /> Johnson stated there was no discussion from the beginning or any indication that the City would conduct <br /> this as a business. Johnson stated the Park Commission was not interested in whether there would be <br /> money made on this park and that the intent was only to try to bring some order to the concept. Johnson <br /> stated the concept of people purchasing a parking permit was studied by the Council and Staff and the <br /> Park Commission had nothing to do that. <br /> Johnson noted the City's park dedication fund has hundreds of thousands of dollars in it and it got there <br /> every time there was a new development in the City. Johnson stated in his view the park dedication fees <br /> should be used in the general area where developments have occurred and that a couple of developments <br /> are now being considered in the area of Lurton Park. The park dedication fees are only allowed for park <br /> investments and not maintenance. <br /> Johnson stated an off-leash dog park was identified as an important thing to have. The Lurton family has <br /> indicated they would still continue to support the dog park but that they would like to see the City put <br /> some money into it. <br /> Schoenzeit stated often in the Planning Commission meetings it is stated that they cannot talk about <br /> certain things, and in general that is wrong. Schoenzeit stated there should not be some prearrangement <br /> to squash comment. <br /> ___ _ <br /> __ _ <br /> _ ___ _ <br /> Page _ __ .__ <br /> 24 <br />