Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,April 18,2016 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> The road access onto North Arm Drive is outside of a curve and would not be expected to have any sight <br /> distance concerns. At approximately 375 feet in length, the cul-de-sac meets the City's 1000 foot <br /> maximum length limitation. <br /> A potential issue for discussion is that the proposed cul-de-sac location abuts the rear yard of the existing <br /> residence at 835 Windjammer Lane. While those owners and their predecessors have experienced a <br /> single private driveway at that location since the house at 835 was built in 1969, the driveway at 800 <br /> North Arm has existed at its current location since at least the 1940s or earlier. Conversion of the <br /> driveway to a road may have negative impacts to those neighbors and consideration should perhaps be <br /> given to requiring additional buffering or separation of the proposed road from the south lot line. The <br /> cul-de-sac could be moved further north into Lot 1 but that may have additional impacts on the already <br /> linear shape of the lots. <br /> Based upon the density being proposed, Staff would conclude and recommend that the road be publicly <br /> owned and maintained. If the road is deemed to be private, the City will require a road, drainage and <br /> utilities easement over the private road, which should be platted as an outlot and designed and built to <br /> City private road standards. Standard perimeter drainage and utility easements around all property <br /> boundaries, as well as conservation and flowage easements over the delineated wetlands will be required. <br /> An additional easement for sewer system maintenance would be appropriate to obtain at the time of <br /> subdivision. <br /> The CMP does not indicate any future trails along North Artn Drive. No sidewalks exist in this area of <br /> Orono and none are contemplated. City Code requires dedication of eight percent of the land as public <br /> park or payment of the equivalent value in cash. The anticipated park fee would be $5,550 per lot, for a <br /> total park fee of$11,100. <br /> The property will also be subject to the stormwater and drainage trunk fee. If the existing residence is <br /> intended to remain,the Code would suggest that the fee would be approximately$10,500. If it is <br /> removed, the fee would be$15,750. The existing sewer connection for the house on Lot 3 runs across <br /> proposed Lots 1 and 2 along the shoreline. Leaving it as is will require establishment of easements <br /> between the properties. Adding sewer stubs to serve Lots 1 and 2 is likely necessary and may be difficult <br /> since the existing gravity line is approximately l5 to 20 feet below existing grade. Municipal water is not <br /> available and not planned to be extended to this area of Orono so private wells will be required. <br /> The property contains a narrow strip of delineated wetland along the northerly shoreline, which would <br /> presumably remain untouched. The City will require a conservation and flowage easement over this strip <br /> of wetland. Due to the need for vehicular access for municipal sewer maintenance,the City will likely <br /> require that buffer widths and locations be established in a manner that will accommodate such <br /> maintenance. <br /> The site is relatively open, with one significant wooded area in the steep slope area directly downhill from <br /> the proposed building site on Lot 1. The developer is encouraged to preserve existing vegetation to the <br /> extent possible. It is likely, however,that connection to the municipal sewer along the shore will require <br /> some disruption to the wooded area. The property will also be subject to the City's Conservation Design <br /> Ordinance. Each of the lots will be subject to Tier 1 hardcover limits. <br /> Staff recommends the Planning Commission discuss the issues outlined in Staff's report and provide the <br /> developer with an overview of the pertinent City ordinances and how they affect the proposed plat. <br /> Page 5 of 32 <br />