My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-18-2016 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
04-18-2016 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 2:54:05 PM
Creation date
8/24/2016 2:54:01 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday, April 18, 2016 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Curtis stated the Planning Commission should open the public hearing and receive any feedback from the <br /> public and then discuss the two options. The application should be tabled after direction is given to Staff. <br /> A draft resolution will be prepared for review at the May Planning Commission meeting. <br /> Staff further solicited comments from a small group of builders active in Orono on the proposed options. <br /> The comments were received at the time of the drafting of Staf�s memo. Revised comments were <br /> received after completion of Staff's report and have been distributed to the Commissioners. <br /> The Planning Commission had no questions for Staff. <br /> Chair Leskinen opened the public hearing at 10:08 p.m. <br /> John Quinlivan, Gordon James Builders, stated a large number of projects that they do are within Orono <br /> or the surrounding area. Quinlivan stated approximately 90 percent of the projects that they do in Orono <br /> on lots that are under half an acre massing is an issue. Quinlivan stated two-acre properties are in the <br /> 16,000 square foot range and are not impacted. Where the massing poses a challenge is in areas like <br /> Casco Point with the smaller lots. <br /> Quinlivan indicated they are currently working on a 10,559 square foot lot. As a result, the garage is <br /> essentially on the city street. Quinlivan stated it is a beautiful lot but it is not as tight as someone would <br /> think because the house is pulled back. Under the City's limitations, they would be allowed a1,583 <br /> square foot limit on the footprint. If a very small 3-stall garage or a two-stall garage is constructed, that <br /> results in another 600 to 650 square feet. If a 10' x 15' deck, consisting of 150 square feet, and a 100 <br /> square foot front entry is constructed,that would leave 683 square feet for a main floor, which essentially <br /> cannot be done. <br /> Quinlivan stated there are several lots in that area where new build will never be an option unless <br /> someone is willing to build a very small house with a 600 square foot main floor. Quinlivan stated <br /> Orono's massing regulations make it difficult to construct a lot on that size lot and kind of shuts any <br /> compromises down. Quinlivan stated he would like to see the City allow the smaller pieces to be <br /> developed using FAR, which would allow those small lots to be developed. <br /> As it relates to the height restriction,the issue is not so much the height restriction but it is when they <br /> encounter some ground water issues. Quinlivan stated most cities will allow them to pull that water out <br /> but Orono does not allow someone to do that because Orono uses existing grade to determine how much <br /> of the structure can go out of the ground for that two and a half story. Quinlivan stated that may make <br /> sense to all the engineers and the Watershed District,but it is falling outside of the 2.5 story parameter. <br /> As a result, the roofline is brought down two feet, which does not always look architecturally right,but it <br /> is the only way to make the house work. <br /> Quinlivan stated those are some of the things they would like the City to consider. <br /> Schoenzeit asked if soil samples are being taken before they start construction to determine where the <br /> water is. <br /> Quinlivan indicated they can do borings but that those do not always show where the water is since the <br /> water can be found in a different spot. Quinlivan stated if there are poor or organic soils, they like to <br /> remove those. <br /> Page 27 of 32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.