Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday, March 21, 2016 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> The location of the applicants' existing residence is conforming to the zoning standards of the RR-1 B <br /> Rural Residential District. However, the Shoreland Overlay District regulations regarding average <br /> lakeshore setback are impossible to meet for constructing an addition to the applicants' home. The <br /> adjacent residence structure on the lakeshore lot to the immediate south is located less than 15 feet from <br /> the Brown Road right-of-way where a 50-foot setback would normally be required. lf that residence was <br /> set back the minimum 150 feet from the OHWL of Dickey Lake, the applicants would not require an <br /> average setback variance. Staff believes there will be no negative visual impacts to the neighboring <br /> homes. <br /> Staff recommends approval of the average setback variance. <br /> Lemke stated the property at 2015 appears to come to a point. Lemke asked whether that is considered <br /> lakeshore. <br /> Gaffron indicated it would be considered lakeshore. Gaffron indicated the reason it becomes a lakeshore <br /> lot is because the lot continues into the lake and that the survey confirms that. <br /> Lemke asked if the lakeshare is determined by a certain elevation. <br /> Gaffron stated it is. Back in 1992, the City adopted the Shoreland Ordinance at the request of the DNR in <br /> order to establish an OHWL. This property is one that did not have that elevation so the City went <br /> through a process to define the elevation of the OHWL based on historical records and trees, etc. Gaffron <br /> noted that elevatioi7 has been established for more than 20 years and that there is no question from a legal <br /> perspective that this is a lakeshore lot. <br /> Greg Reitan, Applicant, stated the purpose of the variance is to allow them to remodel the existing house. <br /> Chair Leskinen opened the public hearing at 7:03 p.m. <br /> Tom Lane, 915 North Brown Road, stated it does not appear this addition will impact his sightlines down <br /> to the lake and that it should be an enhancement to the neighborhood. <br /> Chair Leskinen closed the public hearing at 7:04 p.m. <br /> Leskinen stated the request is completely reasonable. Leskinen noted if the Brown farm were ever <br /> rebuilt, it would need to be pushed back to meet the 50-foot street setback and that defining the lakeshore <br /> setback by a liome that is nonconforming seems unreasonable. <br /> Thiesse asked if the existing trees will be removed. <br /> Reitan indicated one maple tree will likely l�eed to be removed. <br /> Thiesse moved, Olson seconded,to recommend approval of Application No. 16-3812, Greg Reitan <br /> and Sally Neubauer, 925 Brown Road North, granting of an average lakeshore setback variance. <br /> VOTE: Aves 5, Nays 0. <br /> Page 6 of 21 <br />