My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-21-2016 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
03-21-2016 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 2:50:24 PM
Creation date
8/24/2016 2:50:11 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,March 21, 2016 <br /> 6:30 dclock p.m. <br /> Leskinen noted what is before the Plamling Commission tonight is a lot area variance and a rear setback <br /> variance and that she is not sure the Cotnmission can address the issue with the building height and <br /> driveway grade. <br /> Curtis stated she will discuss Mr. Greimann's comments with the City Engineer to make sure his concerns <br /> are addressed. <br /> Leskinen stated as it relates to the rear yard setback and the way the house is proposed to be on the lot, it <br /> makes sense given the location and the type of lot it is. Leskinen stated in her view the practical difficulty <br /> criteria have been met to grant the variance. <br /> Lemke commented he does not see a problem with the application. <br /> Thiesse stated he also does not see a problem but that this is a clean slate and the house could be adjusted. <br /> Schoenzeit stated even though the survey is showing some of the potential grade, at this time the applicant <br /> is telling the Commission that that is not his plan. <br /> Thiesse noted the survey has elevations on it. <br /> Schoenzeit asked what the applicant meant when he said the grade is not set. <br /> Denman indicated they have to meet a minimum floor elevation no matter what. The house will be a two- <br /> story with a full basement and that he did not think they would have to discuss the elevation tonight and <br /> did not bring those numbers. Denman stated they are attempting to set the house on the lot to provide the <br /> best back yard given the house next door, and if the house were to be turned, Denman stated he is not sure <br /> they can fit the house on there. <br /> Thiesse noted the driveway is set as far away from the curve as possible, which should help with the <br /> sightlines. Thiesse stated he is happy with the design and believes it is reasonable. <br /> Lemke moved, Olson seconded, to recommend approval of Application No. 16-3808, Rick Denman <br /> on behalf of Casco Ventures, LLC,3800 Casco Avenue, granting of a lot area variance and a rear <br /> setback variance, subject to Staff recommendations. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> 3. #16-3811 JAMISON KOHOUT/LANDSOURCE,LLC,3438 LYRIC AVENUE, <br /> VARIANCES,6:44 P.M.—6:57 P.M. <br /> Jamison Kohout, Landsource, LLC, was present. <br /> Gaffron stated the applicant is requesting lot area and lot width variances in order to construct a new <br /> residence to replace the existing residence on the property. This lot would qualify for buildability without <br /> area and width variances under the Shoreland regulations. However, a qualifier far taking advantage of <br /> that is a hardcover limitation of 25 percent. This property is in Tier 3, which normally allows 35 percent <br /> hardcover. In order to be able to exceed 25 percent up to the 35 percent limit, the lot area and width <br /> variances are required. <br /> Page 3 of 21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.