My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-12-1986 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
1980-1989
>
1986
>
05-12-1986 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/8/2012 4:54:44 PM
Creation date
8/8/2012 4:54:44 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 12, 1986 <br />#991 & #1018 ULRICH continued <br />City Admini <br />the 4 areas <br />Area 1 <br />Area 2 <br />Area 3 <br />Area 4 <br />strator Bernhardson explained and pointed out <br />to be dealt with in this matter: <br />- Addition of 3 -6" of topsoil near the lagoon <br />- Extension of 2' foundation drain in the 0- <br />75' zone to the lake <br />- Placement of a 6' berm near the road <br />- Fill between 1535 & 1595 Bohn's Point Rd. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the Planning <br />Commission recommended approval of the final grading <br />plans except for the berming, which they recommended <br />removal of the berms and restoration to the natural and <br />original state. She noted that the water quality from <br />the foundation drain was found to be excellent. <br />Mr.. Ulrich stated that the purpose of the berm was for <br />privacy due to the scale of the house. He stated that <br />the neighbors were agreeable to a 6' berm. <br />Councilmember Frahm stated that a 6' fence is not <br />allowed therefore a 6' berm should not be allowed. He <br />recommended a 3 -1/2' berm in relation to the allowed 3- <br />1/2' fence. It was noted that the ordinance does not <br />address berms, however, Frahm stated that he felt the <br />intent of the fence ordinance would include berms. <br />Mayor Butler stated that evergreen plantings would <br />serve the same purpose and blend in with the character <br />of the neighborhood. <br />Councilmember Frahm stated that he had concerns <br />regarding the installation of the foundation drain to <br />the lake and that the City should define the standards <br />before approved. <br />Mayor Butler suggested requiring a letter of credit and <br />developer's agreement for the landscape plan in order to <br />assure the completion of this project. <br />Councilmember Grabek stated that it should be noted that <br />no fence could be erected on top of the 3 -1/2' berm. <br />Attorney Tom Humphrey stated that they have no problem <br />with submitting the letter of credit and defering action <br />on-drain ditch until standards are established,.however <br />they were opposed to limiting the berms to 3 -1/2' feet <br />as the ordinance is silent regarding height of berms and <br />that there is no factual basis to impose a limitation on <br />the height of the berm. <br />K <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.