Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 10, 1986 <br />#967 & #968 IDSTROM continued <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator noted that the driveway <br />has been reviewed by staff and finds no problem with the <br />access location. He also noted the potential of a <br />future third lot which would create problems for the <br />applicant. <br />Mayor Butler stated that the resolution should note the <br />potential problems regarding future re- subdivision which <br />would require the relocation of the access to properties <br />off the private street. <br />Mr. Idstrom stated he was not concerned with a third lot <br />at this time and would deal with that problem in the <br />future if it arose. <br />Councilmember Adams stated he found no problem with the <br />proposed subdivision of two lots only but would if there <br />were three. <br />It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by <br />Councilmember Frahm, directing staff to draft a <br />resolution with the appropriate variance relating to the <br />frontage and specifying that this is approval of two <br />lots noting the future problems of a third lot, to be <br />presented before final approval at the March 24, 1986 <br />Council meeting. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. <br />#990 WARD FERRELL <br />3405, 3411, 3415 WATERTOWN ROAD <br />VARIANCE <br />Ward Ferrell was present for this matter along with his <br />attorney, Leroy Haglund. <br />City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for <br />a variances on two existing lots, which are in the 2 <br />acre zone and are substandard under the current code. <br />He stated that this was presented last May as a zoning <br />appeal. He noted that applicant has had septic site <br />testing done and has proposed acceptable primary and <br />alternate sites. <br />Mr. Haglund stated that applicant's dream was to build a <br />house on one of these lots and was platted as such many <br />years ago. He submitted a petition signed by the <br />neighbors stating they have no objections to this <br />proposal. He also submitted aerial photos to show that <br />the applicant's proposal would not be inconsistant with <br />the area. <br />3 <br />