Laserfiche WebLink
_ ` <br /> 'I'elephone 473-7357 <br /> x-, <br /> �:K: <br /> t� �{r� <br /> ���=4�h� � � CITY of ORONO <br /> Yost Office Hox 66•Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323•Municipal Offices <br /> t On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka <br /> e - • s <br /> August 18 , 1983 <br /> Mr . Roger W. Lemieux, Real Estate Specialist <br /> Field Real Estate Building Office <br /> P. O. Box 69069 <br /> St. Paul, Minnesota 55169 <br /> Dear Mr . Lemieux: <br /> The Orono City Council, staff, and I have been reviewing the Crystal <br /> Bay Post Office operation since the building was originally purchased <br /> by the City of Orono September 20 , 1979 . <br /> December l, 1980 , the City negotiated a month to month tenancy with the <br /> now retired Head of Postal Department Real Estate Mr . R. W. Van Sickle <br /> subject to sharing of the quarters with the City of Orono, (one-half <br /> postal operations, one-half City functions) . <br /> On August 2 and August 4 , 1983 , I met with you to formulate a plan <br /> to share this housing to facilitate required office space for our <br /> staff. At that time , it was brought to my attention by you, that the <br /> postal service could not share office space as originally agreed to <br /> in 1980 . <br /> In our discussions, you related to me the postal department ' s concern <br /> with the present condition of the building, roof, service drive , and <br /> interior . My estimate to complete this work is $12 ,000 or 75$ of the <br /> original building cost. After reviewing this capital funding and a <br /> complete detail of actual income and expenditures for the 1982 calendar <br /> year, we have a loss of $2 , 650 . 15 per year . If I disregard the <br /> depreciation factor of l00 �nd capital expenditures, our net in rent <br /> is less than our return on the money, if it were invested at today ' s <br /> interest rate . <br /> Several factors cause the City to reconsider the present monthly rental <br /> arrangement: <br /> l. The postal service department ' s decision not to reduce its present <br /> space requirement from 914 sq. ft. to 250 sq. ft. as originally <br /> agreed to by Mr. Van Sickle . <br />