Laserfiche WebLink
' , � <br /> „*`�,. w�; ,� <br /> ,..,, <br /> . ,,..� <br /> , . , <br />�: � <br /> F <br /> Date Application Received: 09/23/09 <br /> Date Application Considered as Complete: 09/28/09 <br /> 120-Day Review Period Expires: 01/26/2010 <br /> To: Chair Kang and Planning Commission Members <br /> From: Melanie Curtis, Planning & Zoning Coordinator <br /> Date: 12 November 2009 <br /> Subject: #09-3428 Michael & Marilyn Huthwaite 3382 Bayside Road <br /> • Variances & Conditional Use Permit <br /> • Public Hearing <br /> ------------=----------------------------------------------------------------------- <br /> Zoning District: LR-1A One Family Lakeshore Residential District (2 acres) <br /> Lot Area: 34,400 s.f. (0.79 acre) <br /> Lot Width: 107' + 182' at Bayside Road (the road curves) <br /> Application Summary; In order to construct a replacement residence the applicants <br /> request a conditional use permit for grading within 75' of Stubbs Bay Creek as well as <br /> lot area, creek setback, and hardcover within the 0-75' & 75'-250' setback zone <br /> variances. <br /> � Staff Recommendation: Plannin Staff recommends a roval with conditions. <br /> List of Exhibits <br /> Exhibit A. Revised Survey dated 11/06/09 <br /> Exhibit B. Revised House Plans dated 10/28/09 <br /> Exhibit C. Revised Landscape Plan dated 11/02/09 <br /> Exhibit D. Overlay of Previous Plans to Revised Plans <br /> � Exhibit E. Application Extension Letter <br /> Exhibit F. Staff Report dated 10/14/09 <br /> Exhibit G. Planning Commission Action Notice dated 10/20/09 <br /> Exhibit H. Draft PC Minutes dated 10/19/2009 <br /> Exhibit I. City Engineer Comments <br /> Background . <br /> At the October meeting the Planning Commission tabled this application directing the <br /> applicants to address the following: <br /> 1. The footprint of the home should be reduced in order to better fit within the required <br /> street, side, and creek setback. The creek setback was identified as a priority. <br /> 2. The attached garage could be reduced in order to alleviate a portion of the <br /> encroachment into the creek setback. <br /> The Planning Commission seemed to feel the CUP for stream bank stabilization and the <br /> variances for the proposed crossing or footbridge over the creek were acceptable. <br /> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br />