My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-19-2009 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2009
>
10-19-2009 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/6/2012 11:33:08 AM
Creation date
8/6/2012 11:32:58 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
203
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. � <br /> , PC Exhibit B <br /> HARDSHIP DOCUMENTATION FORM <br /> This form is a required submittal for ALL variance appiications. An applicafion will not be considered <br /> complete or placed on any meeting agendas until this form is complete and submitted to the City. . <br /> Minnesota State Statutes Sectipn�394.27, Subdivision 7 requires that a hardship be ciemonstrated in•order for a <br /> variance to be granted. The hardship must be unique to the property as variances run with the land and not the <br /> land owner. Personal and economic situations are not considersd vafid hardships. In order for an application to <br /> be heard by the Planning Commission and City Council a hardship having merit must be demonstrated. <br /> HOW DO I PROVE A HARDSHIP? <br /> This form has 12 points outlining the basis City staff uses to determine if a hardship exists and how the variance <br /> will affect the surrounding community. To prove a hardship, address all the relevant points listed below and <br /> answer them as clearly as possible. . <br /> Since you are requesting the code exception, you have the burden of proving that the variance is justi�ed. <br /> The information the City receives is what is used in determiriing a denial or approval recommendation. If you <br /> leave something out it will not be considered. <br /> Please address each of these hardship criteria as fhey relate to the requesf, if they do not apply, write N/A in the <br /> space provided.• <br /> 1. "The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under condifions allowed by the official <br /> � controls." <br /> True. See Hardship Statement on p. 18. <br /> 2. "The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created•by the landowner." <br /> True. No front entrance to bualding. Originally designed and later expanded as <br /> an office facilitv. Now a reli�ious or�anization and church building ' <br /> 3. "The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality." <br /> True <br /> 4. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property <br /> exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter." . � <br /> We are investing additional funds to improve the function and appearance of the <br /> � D oD -rtV. . <br /> , 5. "Undue hardship also includes, but is not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy <br /> sysEems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, <br /> . Section 116J.06, Subd.2, when in harmony with this CFaapter." <br /> N/A <br /> 6. "The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not <br /> permitted under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is locafed." <br /> Use not chan�in�. <br /> RE�Ei�lE�� . <br /> APR � � 2009 <br /> . - 17- <br /> �ITY OF Ot�C)i�J <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.