My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-19-2009 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2009
>
10-19-2009 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/6/2012 11:33:08 AM
Creation date
8/6/2012 11:32:58 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
203
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� , <br /> PC Exhibit J �I <br /> 2335 Highway 36 W <br /> St.Paul,MN 55113 <br /> Te1651-636-4600 <br /> Fax 651-636-1311 <br /> www.bonestroo.com <br /> October 6, 2009 �Bonestroo <br /> Ms. Melanie Curtis <br /> Planning and Zoning Coordinator <br /> City of Orono <br /> Post Office Box 66 <br /> Crystal Bay, MN 55323 <br /> Re: 3382 Bayside Road <br /> File No. 000139-09000-1 <br /> File No. 09-3428 <br /> Dear Melanie: <br /> We have reviewed the plans for the proposed new home construction at 3382 Bayside Road. <br /> The grading plans are dated 9-25-09 and the landscaping pians are dated 9-21-09. We have the <br /> following comments with regards to engineering matters: <br /> • The proposed retaining wall is shown as 4.0 feet in height. If field changes increase the <br /> height, engineering design and details must be submitted for review and approval. <br /> • An unclassified wetland has been identified along the creek that will trigger Orono's <br /> wetland buffer ordinance and must be shown on the plans. This will require a wetland <br /> delination. <br /> • The wetland classification must be determined to properly apply the bufFer ordinance. <br /> The applicant must use the Minnesota Routine Assessment Method (MnRAM)to classify <br /> the wetland. <br /> • The landscaping plan indicates that the existing buckthorn hedge is to remain. <br /> • The landscaping plan shows a bridge over the creek and the site plans do not. If a <br /> bridge is to be installed, detailed engineering design information must be submitted for <br /> review. The bridge work may also require permits from USCAE, DNR, and MCWD. We <br /> recommend that the applicant provide evidence that these permits have been obtained <br /> or that they are not needed. <br /> • This project will disturb more than 100 CY of material. Sediment and erosion control <br /> information meeting the requirements of Orono's City Code 79-7(c)(2) must be <br /> submitted. The minimum $2000 sediment and erosion control financial security should <br /> be required of the applicant for this permit. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.