My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-21-2009 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
09-21-2009 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/6/2012 11:19:15 AM
Creation date
8/6/2012 11:19:01 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
251
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COA�VIISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,August 17,2009 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> (2. #OS-3164 CITY OF ORONO, CONSER VATION DESIGN ORDINANCE, 6:35 P.M. — 6:58 <br /> P.M., Continued) <br /> Gaffron indicated he would also be willing to review the MLCCS definitions to see whether the City's <br /> standards should be updated. <br /> Haskamp stated she has brought a copy of the MLCCS definitions and would be willing to provide those <br /> to Planner Gaffron. <br /> Gaffron stated he would welcome the input provided by Ms.Haskamp. <br /> Kempf closed the public hearing at 6:57 p.m. <br /> Gaffron indicated he will follow up on the public comments and bring the draft ordinance back to the <br /> Planning Commission for their review. <br /> Berg moved,Kang seconded,to table Application#OS-3164, City of Orono, Conservation Design <br /> Ordinance. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. <br /> 3. #09-3411 DAVID FOX ON BEHALF OF BILL FOX TRUSTEE, 1095 FERNDALE <br /> ROAD,VARIANCE AND CONDITIONAL USE PERNIIT,6:58 P.M.—7:42 P.M. <br /> Darren Schmidt,Builder, and David Fox,Applicant,were present. <br /> Curtis stated the applicant is proposing to construct a replacement residence and is requesting a <br /> conditional use permit in order to rearrange the floodplain on the property and the following variances: <br /> 1. Lot area. Excluding the area below the OHW of Lake Minnetonka, the lot is 1.27 acres when the <br /> zoning dish-ict requires two acres. <br /> 2. Lot width. The property has a defined lot width of 176 feet at the OHWL and 174 feet at the 75 <br /> foot setback. The zoning district requires 200 feet of width. <br /> 3. Lakeshore setback. The applicant is proposing to set the house back 12 to 50 feet from the lake <br /> when the shoreland regulations require a 75-foot setback from the lake. <br /> 4. Average lakeshore setback. The proposed home is shown in location which improves the average <br /> lakeshore setback encroachment by 32 feet for the property to the west and slightly improves the <br /> encroachment for the property to the east. However,the home still encroaches up to 44 feet into <br /> the average lakeshore setback and will be taller than the current home. <br /> 5. Floodplain setback. The house would be set back 2 to 64 feet from the mitigated floodplain.The <br /> floodplain regulations require a 15-foot setback. <br /> 6. Hardcover within the 0-75 foot zone. Hardcover in the 0-75 foot zone is proposed to be 24.4 <br /> percent,reduced from 27.6 percent. In addition to the proposed home and a 653 square foot <br /> patio,there is a stone border and a wooden wall along the lake which are currently proposed to <br /> remain. This would net a 490 square foot reduction in hardcover. <br /> PAGE 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.