My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-21-2009 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2009
>
09-21-2009 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/6/2012 11:19:15 AM
Creation date
8/6/2012 11:19:01 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
251
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,August 17,2009 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> in its place. The building inspector then said a permit was required. The issue was discussed back and <br /> forth with the City and they eventually paid a citation for the deck. The building inspector also required <br /> them to lower a portion of the deck,which was done, and they were told the deck was fine after that. <br /> They were not told that they needed to obtain a permit after that and they were not aware it was still an <br /> issue. <br /> Anderson stated a number of neighbors in the neighborhood have parking in the front,and their parking in <br /> the front has existed since 1947. Anderson noted Crystal Bay Road is narrow and that people do park on <br /> the street. One car is parked in the back but they are unable to park more cars'in;,that area since it would <br /> protrude out into the road. ,��'```i, <br /> � <br /> �:� <br /> �� ,.,. <br /> Leskinen asked what would be necessary to correct the situation with the deck. <br /> � �� �� <br /> Curtis stated it should be addressed within this application as far as location and"size, and then a building <br /> �,.._:;:�, • '�,-..�, <br /> permit obtained once the deck is approved. Curtis noted the applicants are proposing to reduce the size of <br /> the deck but that the Planning Commission should review�lie property as if the deck�``"e e.not there and <br /> ,r <br /> decide whether it would be allowed. - <br /> ..;. <br /> Kang commented she appreciates the applicants reducing the1li'ardcouer to 35 percent, an that given the <br /> '�.;..:� <br /> reduction in hardcover, she would view the application somewhat fa�,�o,rably. <br /> � `'�::,�. <br /> Rice noted the hardcover calculations do not mc ud'e the rock and rubberrnembrane area. <br /> ��� �� <br /> Curtis stated she would like to see the hardcover�areas de ieted�on the survey and included in the <br /> calculations. ' "+��'"�' <br /> �,;;:,� �- .. <br /> Rice asked whether the application.sliould come back before the Planning Commission since all of the <br /> hardcover reductions are riot depicted on their plan. <br /> ��,. �'"�, . <br /> Kempf asked whether the Pla nmg Commrssion�hould 'ust set a number for the hardcover subject to the <br /> �.- � �,J <br /> drainage issues-bemg-resolved with�the City°Erigiri�ee,ry' <br /> ,,� '�-.�. `�� <br /> Curtis in�id cated she would like,the plan�to,come back before the Planning Commission. <br /> `�� �� <br /> ,:,� �°� ���.. <br /> It was the consensus of the Plann�g Cor�,nmission that the setback variance is okay. <br /> '�� �:`,� <br /> Kempf stated as 't relates to the corner requiring a setback,that does not appear to be an issue. Kempf <br /> `�_ �� t.;±� <br /> asked how the Plarining Commission feels about the covered porch. <br /> 1.�,��� <br /> Rice commented the Plari�nirig Commission has typically approved smaller covered entryways. <br /> ,�" <br /> Curtis noted the covered entryway extends out six feet. <br /> Kempf stated he can see a need for the covered entryway. Kempf asked whether there is a rear door into <br /> the addition. <br /> Morris stated there will be a sliding glass door off of the addition but that the main entry will be through <br /> the covered porch. <br /> PAGE 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.