|
, ,
<br /> PC Exhibit G
<br /> MINUTES OF THE -
<br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
<br /> Monday,August 17,2009
<br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m.
<br /> Berg moved,Leskinen seconded,to table Application#09-3411,David Fox on behalf of Bill Fox
<br /> Trustee, 1095 Ferndale Road. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0.
<br /> *4. #09-3415 CITY OF ORONO,DUPLEX CODE AMENDMENT
<br /> Berg moved,Rice seconded,to recommend approval of Application#09-3415,City of Orono,
<br /> Duplex Code Amendment. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0.
<br /> ��
<br /> *5. #09-3420 CITY OF ORONO,WETLAND CREDIT CODE AMENDMENT
<br /> ������..
<br /> Berg moved,Rice seconded,to recommend approval of Application#09`3420,City of Orono,
<br /> Wetland Credit Code Amendment. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0: �� �'���.
<br /> _ �_..;��..1.-
<br /> *6. #09-3421 JAMES AND JACQUELINE NE. ;`4060 DAE•L ROAD,VARI'ANCE~
<br /> Ber moved Rice seconded to recommend a roval of A".°lieaho�-3421 James"and Jac ueline .
<br /> g > > PP PP .:�, 9
<br /> Neve,4060 Dahl Road,granting of a variance. VOTE: Ayes�S`;Nays 0.
<br /> ���_ ��
<br /> 7. #09-3422 RICHARD &LEESA AND RSON;`3205 CRYST�BAY ROAD,VARIANCES,
<br /> 7:42 P.M.—8:29 P.M. �
<br /> k ?r'��1�!��
<br /> , Q'
<br /> Leesa Anderson,Applicant,�and Jim>Morris,Build� ere presen�'
<br /> ������ �
<br /> Curtis stated the applicants�are reyue ting hardcover v iances and a side yard setback variance in order to
<br /> �'—tie�f�r�!� ;� �"+, 10
<br /> construct a 20' x 26' two-s�o,ry living space addition to the existing home with a 0 foot setback from the
<br /> side lot line where a 10 foot setbackfis required as well as onstruct a roof over a deck which would be
<br /> �`*�',y�`°°�. - <°�^-,--.--°�
<br /> 6.4 feet from the side lo,t,�lme where�a 10 foot;setb��,is required.
<br /> ��� ��
<br /> The appli�ants' property is twonseparate lots historically acting as one, split by the municipal boundary
<br /> between Orono and Minnetonka�Beach. Th�e is a shed and 1-1/2 homes located within the Orono
<br /> o- "�`tli�'` ��.,�� �`�;�'
<br /> portion of� e_.p�roperty. The applicants n�e,ed more living space to accommodate their growing family and
<br /> have considered�connecting the�f,�wo homes. A two-story addition is proposed on the back of the home
<br /> and a roof is p p sed over an existing deck on the lake side and west side of the home, effectively
<br /> creating a porch. Tiie porch addition is proposed to be set back 6.4 feet from the side lot line where a 10
<br /> foot setback is requ ed an�he'�i-wo-story addition is proposed at a 0 foot setback from the side lot line
<br /> where a 10 foot setback�'�s,`�als'o required.
<br /> �
<br /> The property contains a great deal of landscaping consisting of patios,parking areas,pathways, walls and
<br /> structures The applicants have proposed to remove minimal amounts of what exists in conjunction with
<br /> their proposal. They have proposed a 64 square foot reduction within the 0-75 foot zone and 97 square
<br /> feet within the 75-250 foot zone.
<br /> Furthermore,the deck where the proposed porch addition is to be was constructed illegally in 1988. The
<br /> City notified the applicants that permits and hardcover variance approvals were required. A citation was
<br /> issued but the issue of the lack of approval has not been resolved.
<br /> PAGE 9
<br />
|