Laserfiche WebLink
• ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR MAY 24, 1999 <br />( #2466 J;.::= R= *en_s!j9hn Wineton, Ce*!tinued) <br />which is what came before the City Council at one of their previous meetings. Winston stated that <br />they are not requesting any outlots with their application. The City Council had approved the <br />application with the 50 foot outlot at the rear but did not require the 30 foot outlot. Winston <br />stated that it is the decision of the City Council to determine what outlots, if any, are necessary <br />with this subdivision. <br />Kelley commented that Mr. Winston's view is correct to his understanding. <br />Carlson commented that he wrote a letter regarding the history of this property, noting that he <br />inadvertently forgot to copy a portion of the letter. In 1991 it was anticipated that Crystal Creek <br />Road would be extended across the north piece of the Stubbs property. In exchange for that <br />road, the Stubbs property was expected to be able to access off of Crystal Creek Road. Carlson <br />remarked that the Resolution passed by the City Council stated that Carlson's undeveloped land <br />north of Crystal Creek would also hook up with the Crystal Creek Road through A. Stubbs <br />property. Carlson stated that this was the long -range plan of the City in 1991, and would provide <br />his property with access. Carlson remarked in his opinion Mn/DOT will not allow access off of <br />the new Highway 12, and that this 50 foot road outlot is necessary. <br />• Carlson stated in his opinion it is inappropriate for Mr. Winston to send the letters that he sent to <br />the City Council members and was intended to intimidate and vilify Mr. Kelley. <br />Winston stated that there are two incorrect statements that were made by Mr. Carlson; one, that <br />any road across the northern portion of the property being a benefit to the property owner is <br />erroneous. Currently there 'is no right by Mr. Renckens to access Crystal Bay Road and there is <br />no easement that exists. Mr. Renckens will need to negotiate access off of Crystal Bay Road. <br />Number two, Mr. Carlson does not have any right to access off of the Renckens' property. The <br />establishment of the 50 foot road across the northern section of the property will not benefit <br />Mr. Carlson's property because it is a private road. Winston stated that if an outlot is imposed by <br />the City, that does not entitle Mr. Carlson to any rights to utilize that road absent of the City <br />stating that this will be a public roadway. <br />Renckens stated that in his opinion Mr. Carlson does not have the right to t 11 the City Co!?ncil <br />members what he would like to see as far as traffic safety is concerned. '­ Renckens commented <br />that Mr. Carlson had the option to purchase the piece of land at the top of Stubbs property and <br />that Mr. Carlson is now attempting to take his land for his own personal gain. <br />Flint inquired if this application is denied, when a new application could be submitted. <br />• 13 <br />