Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR MAY 10, 1999 <br />• ( #5 Spring Hill Golf Club, continued) <br />Gaffron said that the conservation and flowage easement has language that does not allow any <br />structures. <br />Jabbour asked what the club plans to do with those two pieces of land in the future. <br />Crosby said the applicant does not know what it plans to do with that property. <br />Flint asked if the applicant can convey the property away. <br />Crosby said it could be conveyed away. <br />Jabbour said it could only be conveyed to an adjacent property owner. <br />Gaffron said that is correct, but it could be changed. <br />Flint asked if there will be language that says they can convey it to the adjacent property <br />owner or to the City. <br />Gaffron said that language can be added. He said language should be added to item 2 on page <br />• 4 of the resolution that states the property can be transferred to the City. <br />Flint agreed. <br />Gaffron asked if the Council members agreed with the wording of item 8 on page 4 regarding <br />the easement for trail purposes. <br />Flint said the City should require a separate survey for the trail. <br />Gaffron said language can be added that states "and as defined by a survey to be supplied <br />prior to final plat approval." <br />Crosby asked how many places along the trail it would go in further than ten feet. The <br />easement could be granted within the ten feet except to describe those portions where it goes <br />into the golf course. <br />Flint agreed that the area in the north is the problem area. He said it's okay if it's a ten -foot <br />easement along the whole trail and only survey it in the area where the trail goes back <br />significantly. <br />Page 13 <br />