Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 8,1999 <br />(#4) #2425 SIDNEYAND BARBARA REBER&SERVICE 800, ING, 2190 WAYZATA • <br />BOULEVARD - Continued <br />Moorse said that the water and sewer lines are in the triangle and that is where the City wants <br />the easement. <br />Barrett said there is an issue of the Long Lake signature. They have agreed informally to <br />cooperate, but there needs to be a formal agreement. <br />Jabbour said he feels Long Lake will cooperate. <br />Pflaum said that the Long Lake City Council meets on March 4th and they will request Long <br />Lake's approval at that meeting. <br />Barrett said the Public Works Director recommended in Item 3, where Mr. Otten would grant <br />an easement of 30 feet in width for the right -of -way to the back of the property, the document <br />should also reflect a temporary construction easement of 44 feet. <br />Mr. Otten agreed. <br />Flint referred to paragraph 7 of the Road Agreement, the indemnification provision. He <br />questioned whether the City should agree to that provision of the agreement. <br />Barrett said he agreed that the City should be removed from an indemnification position on <br />the agreement. <br />Flint asked which alternative is the preferred option. <br />Moorse said where the staff report says "preferred option", that is the applicant's preferred <br />option. Either Option 1 or Option 2 creates the ability for Service 800 to have the type of <br />access they want. <br />Flint said that even pursuing Option 1 will lengthen the period of time in two regards. It <br />requires Mr. Otten to contact the heirs of Mr. Daniels and Mn/DOT requires a long length of <br />time. He said he favors Option 2 because it can be done in a shorter period of time. <br />Moorse said that Mr. Otten would prefer Option 1. <br />Pflaum said that Option 1 allows Mr. Otten to acquire fee title to the easement and ultimately <br />enhances the value of his property. He said that the City doe's have a lot of what it would like <br />without getting the development of parcel 2 right now. He said the access at Brimhall started <br />because it appeared on a City drawing as to a long -term development of the area. By virtue of <br />the discussions that have taken place regarding the development of the Brimhall access, any <br />buyer of Lot 2 will be on notice of Orono's intention to have a road to the rear of the • <br />Page 8 <br />