Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR JANUARY 11, 1999 <br />• 00 #2425, SIDNEY AND BARBARA REBERS /SERVICE 800, INC., 2190 WAYZATA <br />BOULEVARD - continued <br />Gaffron stated the plans came in very late, but the applicant wanted to present the revised proposal. <br />He said the Council has the option to table the matter. <br />Moorse stated that the applicant wanted to get direction from the Council on whether the right - <br />in/right -out access is feasible. <br />Sansevere asked if moving the building is an option. <br />Bredeson stated there would be approximately $125,000 in redesign and other costs and she has a <br />June 1 deadline or she will lose a large contract. She stated the additional costs could make the <br />project infeasible. <br />Jabbour stated that all along the City, the owner of the property and the neighbor were planning the <br />access on the side of the building across from Brimhall. <br />Bredeson stated that all the plans proceeded on the assumption that Mn/DOT would approve their <br />original plan. <br />. Peterson asked if Gaffron has had any conversations with Mn/DOT regarding the access. <br />• <br />Gaffron stated he spoke to Mn/DOT on January 8, but not prior to that time. Gaffron stated that staff <br />had no knowledge of the existing easement on Otten's property. <br />Jabbour polled the Council regarding the access. <br />Kelley stated he is in favor of the access across from Brimhall. <br />Peterson stated she is in favor of the temporary right - in/right -out with a stipulation that it be closed <br />if the rear frontage road is put in. <br />Flint stated he favors the access across from Brimhall, but he wants staff to contact Mn/DOT to see <br />if Mn/DOT would approve the original access proposed by the applicant. <br />Sansevere agreed with Flint that staff should contact Mn/DOT regarding the original plan. He favors <br />the right - in/right -out access if there is no other option. <br />Jabbour said he favors the original plan as submitted by the applicant. He does not feel it is realistic <br />to expect the frontage road will be put in. If a frontage road is going to be considered, all of the <br />neighbors must be notified. <br />Page 7 <br />