My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-25-2012 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
06-25-2012 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2012 4:29:44 PM
Creation date
8/1/2012 4:29:44 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, June 25, 2012 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(3. #10 -3491 CITY OF ORONO - HARDCOVER REGULATIONS AMENDMENT, Continued) <br />Gozola stated Tier 1 is basically 0 -250 feet out. Anything that is lakeshore or if there is a .buffer between <br />you and the lake and your land is 50 feet to 200 feet from the lake, you would be assigned to Tier 1. The <br />second tier was 250 feet out to 500 feet and the third tier was 500 feet out to 1000 feet. <br />McMillan stated in her view it would be good to spell that out. McMillan noted there are some fairly <br />large parcels that have not been subdivided within the City. McMillan asked what will happen when <br />those lots are subdivided. <br />Gozola stated the City would need to look at those parcels at the time they are subdivided and determine <br />which tier they would fall into. <br />McMillan asked whether the City would need to codify that policy. <br />Mattick stated the map designates the.; various tiers and that the map would govern which tier a particular <br />property is placed into. r <br />McMillan asked what they would do in the event one of the larger properties gets subdivided. <br />• <br />Mattick stated the City could also do a text amendment on the larger parcels and designate in which tier <br />the property is located. • <br />Bremer commented there appears to be some sporadic parcels assigned to the various tiers. Bremer stated <br />she is assuming there was some logic behind the various assignments, but that she is looking at the map <br />overall. <br />Rahn stated when you look at the tier overlay map, it does not seem like it was developed using distance, <br />and that was why he was questioning how the tiers were set up. <br />Bremer asked whether Staff has had an opportunity to review the map. <br />Gaffron indicated Staff has seen it but that they have not gone parcel by parcel to see whether they have <br />been correctly placed in the right tier. Gaffron stated Staff can do that if the Council feels it is necessary. <br />Bremer stated she would like to figure out the best way to do some random spot checking of the overlay <br />map. Bremer stated in her view the biggest issue that she has with the ordinance is the placement of the <br />properties into different tiers. The residents understand the different zones under the current system and <br />to go to something different has to result in something better. Bremer stated the City will never have 100 <br />percent assurance that all of the lots have been correctly identified. <br />Gozola stated one of the big benefits of going to the overlay map is that the residents can go`to the map <br />rather than a survey and see how much hardcover they are allowed. The hardcover in each tier is based <br />on the total lot coverage. The resident can look up their overall lot acreage and they know exactly what <br />hardcover is allowed. <br />Bremer noted there is a different percentage for beyond 250 feet. • <br />Page 8 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.