Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, June 25, 2012 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(3. #10 -3491 CITY OF ORONO - HARDCOVER REGULATIONS AMENDMENT, Continued) <br />encroaching on your neighbor's property, that hardcover will be counted against you, which is a <br />clarification from the existing language. <br />Rahn asked if that is something that the City has enforced in the past. <br />Gozola indicated that is how the Code has been interpreted and regulated in the past but it is not clear in <br />the current ordinance. <br />Rahn commented it is hard for him to assess somebody's driveway that might cross the property line back <br />into the percentage of hardcover. <br />Bremer asked if you would include the hardcover of your driveway that encroaches into your neighbor's <br />property. <br />Gozola'siated in his view you'would not. Gozola stated this is an incentive for people to correct those <br />types of situations. <br />Bremer asked if he would envision it as if that 100 square feet were on a different part of the property. <br />n <br />LJ <br />Gaffron stated there have been occasions where there were fairly significant encroachments that Staff • <br />would include in both the enumerator and denominator of the property. If someone has an excess of 100 <br />square feet of hardcover that is on the neighbor's property, Staff is going to expand the size of the <br />property for calculation purposes by 100 square feet and add all of that hardcover into the calculation. <br />Bremer asked if that is how the language is written in the new ordinance. <br />Gozola stated the City can follow its past practices and that in his view the proposed language would not <br />prohibit them from doing that. <br />Gaffron stated he is in agreement that it would not preclude the City from doing that analysis. <br />Bremer stated she would like them to define what that analysis is in the ordinance. <br />Gaffron asked if someone is encroaching on a piece property, whether that means that piece of property is <br />no longer included in the calculation. <br />McMillan stated in her view the lot area should be the person's boundaries. <br />Rahn stated the parcel that is being encroached upon could be looked upon as a shared driveway situation. <br />Rahn stated that will need to be looked at a little closer. <br />Gozola stated as it relates to the provision on the prohibition of hardcover within the 0 -75 foot zone, <br />under the existing code people cannot put hardcover in the 0 -75 foot zone and the new language would <br />include that same prohibition. • <br />Page 6of15 <br />