My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 3116
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 3100 - 3199 (March 23, 1992 - November 9, 1992)
>
Resolution 3116
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/17/2016 1:05:40 PM
Creation date
8/17/2016 1:05:40 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. <br /> � , � , <br /> � O 'V <br /> • O O <br /> b - CITY of ORONO <br /> � F <br /> ��� �G'�' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> �kESH�g' NO. 3116 <br /> 3. e Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application in <br /> an earlier application involving increases in hardcover <br /> within the 75-250' setback area in 1986 (File #1088 ). <br /> Hardcover inventory was determined by the Orono staff and <br /> was reported at 5, 907 s.f. or 28.6�. The current survey of <br /> hardcover by a licensed surveyor shows hardcover within the � <br /> 75-250' setbacic area at 6, 990 s.f. or 38.6�. The applicant <br /> has added no additional improvements resulting" in increases <br /> in hardcover since the 1986 review. <br /> 4. The Orono City Council reviewed this application on April <br /> 27, 1992 and conceptually recommended approval of the <br /> proposed variance based upon the following findings: <br /> a) The proposed second story deck will not result in an <br /> increase in hardcover within the 75-250' setback area <br /> as the deck wi 11 be insta l led over an existing grade <br /> level patio. <br /> • b) There has been no increase in hardcover since an <br /> earlier variance review in 1986 that involved approval <br /> of hardcover variances. <br /> c) Steep topographies of this property make it unfeasible <br /> to remove existing paved areas needed to provide <br /> adequate turnaround maneuverability on site. <br /> 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this <br /> property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to <br /> other property in this zoning district; that granting the <br /> variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, <br /> li,ght, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to <br /> neighboring property; would not merely serve as a <br /> convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate <br /> a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to <br /> preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and <br /> would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning <br /> Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> 6. The City Council has considered this application including <br /> reports by City staff, oral and written comments by the <br /> � applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the <br /> health, safety and welfare of the community. <br /> • Page 2 of 5 • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.