My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 3139
Orono
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7499
>
Reso 3100 - 3199 (March 23, 1992 - November 9, 1992)
>
Resolution 3139
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/17/2016 12:57:26 PM
Creation date
8/17/2016 12:57:26 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
.� , <br /> � O� <br /> • O O <br /> - b. � CITY of ORONO <br /> � � <br /> �� �'�'� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> ��kESH�g'� NO. 313 9 <br /> 2. The property is located in the RR-1B Rural :Residential , <br /> Zoning District requiring 2 acres of dry buildable area. <br /> The total property consists of 38 , 377, s.f. or .88 acres. <br /> 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on <br /> June 15, 1992 and recommended approval of the proposed <br /> variances based upon the following hardships and findings: <br /> � a) The building envelope defined by public rights-of-way <br /> � is less than 1/2 acre in area and subject to RR-1B, 2 <br /> acre rural standards. <br /> b) The existing house is located within substandard <br /> setbacks from the adjacent right-of-ways. � <br /> c) Current detached garage encroaches Dickenson Street <br /> right-of-way and creates hazards for users of Dickenson <br /> • Street and adjacent alley. The structure limits <br /> sighting distance and is a potential hazard for users <br /> of public road. <br /> d) The location of the existing garage in relation to <br /> crest of the hill and adjacent accesses. <br /> e) The location of mature trees to the south of the existing <br /> residence. � <br /> f) Persistent surface runoff/drainage problems that <br /> � necessitate the retention of a low depression or <br /> retention area within the south yard of the property. <br /> . 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this <br /> property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to <br /> other property in this zoning district; that granting the <br /> variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, <br /> light, • air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to <br /> neighboring property; would not merely serve as a <br /> convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate <br /> a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to � <br /> preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and <br /> would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning <br /> Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. � <br /> • Page 2 of 5 <br /> ' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.