Laserfiche WebLink
� � <br /> � i.EGULAR 2iEET�NG OF THE OROPIO CG�UI?CIL� t.OVEMEER 14 , 197? Page 16 <br /> A public hea=_ng has beer. scheduZed �o be held SIJBDIVISION <br /> by the Planning Coma-*�issiom a� 8:00 F.M. on 4�70 & �480 rorest <br /> Noven��r 7� 1g77• Iyke Lan?�in� <br /> (Cantinued) <br /> � Planr:ing Commission t�eeting - Novembe� 7 r 1�77 <br /> I$T_'. Oberhause�i 2R2". u�]�'�r PSr. �,'BCJ�I1 driQ _'�3. RG11ing � <br /> PRx. Oberhauser .presenteci ���� <br /> were in attendance. ��� �� <br /> preliminary plan of proposed division_ ��� <br /> Plannin Commission recommended approval of ���,�r� <br /> g ���� <br /> preliminary plat to provide �wo individual sites <br /> �or the iwo conflicting residences on the properties. <br /> RequeSt access easerlEnts as necessary to eliminate <br /> possible access problems in the �u�cure. . <br /> Council I�ieeting - Nover•tber 14, 1977 <br /> Butler moved, 'resek secondedr �o approve the <br /> preliminary subdivision request of ��'�� Reiling, <br /> 447Q . & 4480 Fores�. Lake Landing, <br /> per the Planning Commission recommendations. 2�otion� <br /> Ayes (5) - Nays (0? . <br /> ANCE <br /> M,=.. .Alan Olson, Assistant Building & Zoning 3925 h7atertown Road <br /> Iidrninistrator, ent°r°3 into the record the iollow- �326 <br /> in.g information concerning a variance request of Lornn Bu�terfield <br /> Loren Butterfield, 3925 Wa�erto�Tn Road, dated <br /> October 13� 1977� �*hich sta�es: <br /> Zoning district requires �ive acres s�itn setbacks <br /> of ?00 f�. from the road and 50 �t. from tne side <br /> lot lines. <br /> The �►ain portion of the er.isting dwelling is setback <br /> 2� �t. from tne street right af way 4:ith a two fooL <br /> er.tension beyond the main �ron� line of the house. <br /> The existing side yard setbaci: fror.i the property <br /> line to the north is 32 it. <br /> Mr. 3utterfield is requesting approv�l of vzriances y <br /> for the proposed addition (family anc -ecreation ���� �� <br /> roon to �he south end of �he nouse and a foyer ane� �� <br /> The pro osed ��� ���� <br /> stoop to �he fron� of the house) _ P ���� <br /> fai*ii,ly-rec room addition would. not in�er`°r° with <br /> the existing non-conforming side yard setback tc �� <br /> the north. This would b� the most logical location. <br /> It would not int�rTere with tne es:isting non- <br /> conforning side yarci se�ac}:_ This addition woeld <br /> be set bacY. from �he street �ur�her than the <br /> e�:isti.ng residence. The proposed Tive foat <br /> foyer additior_ would result in a sligh� encroach�-nent <br /> of the existing Lront yard setback_ <br /> The proposal would require appr�val or a variance <br /> o� 18 r"t. from the side se'-�-bac: requirement and (Con�inued) <br /> 81 ft. from the iront setbac}: requi,er;ient. <br />