Laserfiche WebLink
i <br />_-- . � 309-3395 � <br /> � ;b:; May 18,2009 <br /> • page 5 of 6 <br /> � • � • �' e roposed second.floo"r of a floo�port°n f <br /> � ad'acent to �. p lans. The secon <br /> floor of 1101 that is directl ell, according to �e house p AS a result,of the lot line <br /> laundrY room and �e stairw a condition of <br /> 'acent to 1,101 would resembl These shou d;be coinbined as <br /> 1:105 directly aa1 ro erty is �O �p�cels. � <br /> rearrangement the p P _ ` � . . „ . � <br /> �y approval.) > ,'. - : + t setbaek? The setback is intenhe <br /> ,,, ., the 15 foo - T�s is more of an issue w <br /> ��� "` lications of nqt having a flood. <br /> " � yy{�at are the safery:imp being�aermined during <br /> � ' foundation from e flood waters have the velocit The b�ldu�g�ode <br /> protect the where th ri ra <br /> the floodplain is from a S�e�' osed lakeshore is protected by P p• <br /> rather than from a lake• .T'�e exp . <br /> uire additional measures to protect the foundation. <br /> � �� the file for the screen porch.varian�es is a <br /> I may req U ' ' al. In atio did not exist when <br /> I � � � � orming or illeg <br /> atio non-conf to lndicate the lakeside p � ra�eT �an non- <br /> � Is the lakeside p �is would ma�e �e patio illeg � <br /> � S�,ey �na hardcover calculations th,at seem__. - ha�e been lavvfu�When lt�'''as cons���e <br /> ' ances were granted in 1984• atio must ted in 1975•) <br /> 'i �e �� �e p lations were first adop <br /> ! conform�g• (To be,nonconfqrm�g� a lication #815 (as it <br /> or at some time dur�ng its existence.Hardcover regu al lts removal can be <br /> The entire file for zoning Pp . <br /> i . A licant has been asked to 'rIf�e patio is determined to be illeg <br /> ' � pp exists) is attached. <br /> � - currently , <br /> ce was that <br /> I i required. ` � orch hardcover varian <br /> r - � orch? A condition of the p n �e floodplain <br /> - at is the status of the screen p The dr��'leld is located ��Sts the Applicant <br /> � Wh " drainfield. the variance. Staff sugg <br /> ' the runo� be directed into a �alidating <br /> � -. a so it will be removed, in �dcover, the am°�t of additional hardcover <br /> I - mitigation are u�re feet of h <br /> ' be required to remove 267 sq ; <br /> " allowed for the porch. � � . the hardcover impacts be . <br /> r how maY uixed <br /> �' � ' the limitations on required hardcover removals, to a wetland bue�le surfa e for <br /> �, Given NR St�S recommend a buffer s�il� lace <br /> , . . et� Clty and D ��out rip raP ��'`'ell as�e uould be p vided to rep <br /> , . . offs ath sh <br /> ' along�e sections of the 1akeshore <br /> � 'vewaY• To prevent erosion a OrCh andt�e la�e <br /> � . _ �the new � ath between the screen p <br /> � the existing d�p <br /> � . other issues or concerns with this application? <br /> • �,re there any . ect to: <br /> ' a ro��o f�e conditional use pe�t subj <br /> i Staff Recomm�ri 1 St�recommends pp <br /> � Planning Dep is lower than 930.5. <br /> r- • ' ` � oint of the drivewaY <br /> � � � 1, The plan being revised so no p _ rovided prior to Council <br /> — trees being pl�ted, with t�e plan being p <br /> i _ 2, Replacement <br /> � consideration. <br /> — ces subject to: <br /> _ Pl�ng Staff recommends approval of the varian <br /> f � The ropertY being combined into one t�p��el. <br /> i 1� p e house, especially as viewed from the lake� �e <br /> � 2, To reduce the visible impact of t11 <br /> I � . _�— <br /> � ._ - — -'� <br /> I , _ --_ - - ��--�-� � � <br /> � _ _ _ -- — — ���� OF �ROPJE� <br />