Laserfiche WebLink
.. . <br /> FILE 09-3401 V <br /> April 20,2009 <br /> Page 2 of 2 <br /> Discussion <br /> There was staff turnover when at the time the development was approved. This may be the <br /> reason the rezoning was not done at that time. While.residents of the Navarro development may <br /> be surprised, the rezoning was part of the original plan for the development. It is a specific <br /> condition of the property exchange contract. <br /> If the properly was redeveloped or the existing building expanded the code would require a 35 <br /> setback for the building and a 15 foot setback for parking lot adjacent to the residential lot to the <br /> west. A six foot fence or evergreen screen would also be required along this lot line. <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> Approval of the rezoning from LR-1 C-1 to B-1. <br />