My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 3064
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 3000 - 3099 (August 12, 1991 - March 30, 1992)
>
Resolution 3064
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/17/2016 12:37:30 PM
Creation date
8/17/2016 12:37:30 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
O � O <br />CITY of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />SSOg NO. 3064 <br />4. On October 21, 1991 the Planning Commission reviewed a <br />revised proposal for construction of a 24' x 32' (768 <br />s.f.) garage located 3.3' from the west lot line and <br />10.5' from the south lot line, requiring side and rear <br />setback variances, a lot coverage variance, and a <br />hardcover variance. The Planning Commission voted 6 to <br />0 to recommend approval, based on the following <br />findings: <br />A. The proposed 768 s.f. detached garage replaces <br />a pre-existing 480 s.f. garage, 200 s.f. barn, and <br />80 s.f. storage shed with a single structure of <br />approximately the same square footage as the 3 <br />pre-existing buildings. <br />B. The pre-existing 75-250' hardcover was 50.6%. If <br />• an 8' x 32' portion of the concrete garage slab <br />which was poured without prior approvals is <br />removed, hardcover on the property would be <br />reduced to 46.9% in the 75-250' zone. <br />C. Lot coverage by structures would remain at the <br />pre-existing level of 17.5%. The small lot size <br />of 0.28 -acre constitutes a. hardship to the <br />property. Consolidation of 3, storage buildings on <br />the property into a single building will reduce <br />the visual density and clutter in the <br />neighborhood. <br />D. Locating the garage 10.5' f rom the south 1 of 1 ine <br />is justified from the standpoint that if the <br />garage was 18 s.f. smaller, only a 10' setback <br />would be required rather than 151* for any <br />accessory building of area 750-1000 s.f. The 3.3' <br />setback from the west lot line is justified by the <br />need to maintain the full 32' depth of the garage <br />without encroaching on the loop driveway which <br />serves the immediate neighborhood. <br />5. The revised garage proposal showed a roof peak running <br />east/west, which would discharge stormwater run-off to <br />• applicant's yard rather than the neighboring property. <br />Page 2 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.