Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF T�IE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> • Monday,November 16,2009 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#09-3435 LOREN AND STACEY SCHOENZEIT,4480 FOREST LAKE LANDING,CONT.) <br /> Curtis stated the applicant is requesting the following variances in order to construct a new residence on <br /> the property: <br /> 1. A lot width variance for a lot 56 feet in width at the OHWL and 45 feet in width at the 75 feet <br /> setback where 140 feet is normally required; <br /> 2. A lot area variance to allow redevelopment of a lot 0.34 acre in area where 1.0 acre is required; <br /> 3. A side yard setback variance to allow a 9.7 foot side setback on the south side where a 10-foot <br /> setback is normally required; <br /> 4. A rear yard setback variance to allow an 8-foot rear setback where a 30-foot setback is normally <br /> required; <br /> 5. Hardcover variances to allow 66.1 percent hardcover within the 250-500 foot zone where 30 <br /> percent is normally allowed and 62.8 percent currently exists. <br /> The applicants' property has a very challenging building envelope. The city sewer line crosses through <br /> the property and the slope of the property offer very little flexibility. The applicants have owned the <br /> subject property for nearly 19 years. For the past 10 years,they have been researching and designing a <br /> new home to build on the property. <br /> In 2005,the applicants received approval for a lot line rearrangement in order to allow for a more <br /> reasonable building envelope. That lot line rearrangement was not finalized. The applicants are now <br /> requesting variances in order to build a new residence on the property. They have designed a home which <br /> conforms to the setbacks of the existing home. <br /> The applicants are requesting a variance to allow 66 percent hardcover within the 250-500 foot zone.This <br /> is an increase of 88 square feet from what currently exists. Their proposal,however, offers a significant <br /> 1,144 square foot reduction within the 75-250 foot zone. <br /> In addition,the applicants are proposing to maintain the level of encroachment on the south side lot line <br /> but in a different location than what currently exists. One corner of the proposed home will encroach into <br /> the 10-foot side yard setback by 0.3 feet. The proposed rear or street setback variance would be <br /> essentially the same setback as the existing home in a similar location. The setback is measured from the <br /> street property line; however, due to an unusually wide right-of-way,the actual paved roadway would be <br /> 39 feet at the closest point to the new home. <br /> Staff finds that the applicants' property offers a number of challenges which make development difficult. <br /> The distance between the applicants' proposed home and the adjacent neighbor to the south offers <br /> adequate opportunity for light, air, and open space due to the orientation of the homes on lots: Staff feels <br /> it may be reasonable to allow the rear yard setback variance as the wide right-of-way provides for a buffer <br /> between the home and the street. Finally, the hardcover variance as proposed does not seem unreasonable <br /> considering the other limitations on the property. <br /> The Planning Commission should consider the following issues: <br /> Page <br /> 12 <br />