My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 3046
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 3000 - 3099 (August 12, 1991 - March 30, 1992)
>
Resolution 3046
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2019 2:23:27 PM
Creation date
8/17/2016 12:26:59 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�j •� . ' <br /> � �� , <br /> . o ,,� o ���� <br /> ������� � CITY of ORONO � <br /> � <br /> � �����J���,� � <br /> i �,� ti ,� � �, <br /> '� ` M�,� � �.� �� Gti' RESOWTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> ��kESHOg'� NO. 30 4 6 <br /> b) Existing hardcover in the 75-250' zone is 39.68. There <br /> is no hardcover in the 0-75' zone. The small lot size <br /> of 0. 3 acre, and the location of the house with <br /> attached garage and minimal driveway, all support the <br /> granting of a hardcover vari.ance. <br /> c� The prop�sed 10'x25' three-season porch replaces a pre- <br /> existing 10'x26' upper level deck in the exact same <br /> location, hence the impact of the change in the nature <br /> of the structure is minimal. No lot coverage or <br /> average setback variance is required for this proposal. <br /> 4. There is 326 s.f. excess hardcover in rock and plastic <br /> landscape beds which can be removed to reduce 75-250' zone <br /> hardcover from the pre-existing 39.6$ level to 36.3$. <br /> 5. The City Council has considered this application including <br /> the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, <br /> reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the <br /> effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and <br /> welfare of the community. <br /> 6. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this <br /> property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to <br /> other property in this zoning district; that granting the <br /> variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, <br /> light , air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to <br /> neighboring property; would not merely serve as a <br /> convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate <br /> a demonstrable hardship or di�ficuity; is necessary to <br /> preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and <br /> would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning <br /> Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> Page 2 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.