Laserfiche WebLink
� , <br /> MINUTES OF TAE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,October 19,2009 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> #09-3428 MICHAEL AND MARILYN HUTHWAITE, CONTINUED <br /> square feet of hardcover in the driveway and courtyard,there are 315 square feet of proposed retaining <br /> walls and a proposed foot bridge spanning the creek. <br /> Since the earthwork will take place within the creek located within the 0-75 foot zone and exceeds 10 <br /> cubic yards, a conditional use permit is required. The applicants are working with the MCWD on the <br /> stream bank stabilization project. <br /> The proposed bridge over Stubbs Bay Creek poses a number of issues. First,Orono Code prohibits <br /> structures within 75 feet o this protected tributary. Second,the bridge constitutes hardcover within 75 <br /> feet of the tributary,which is not allowed. Additionally,the bridge cannot be considered the equivalent of <br /> a stairway, lit,landing, or lockbox that would be allowed at the shoreline of a lake because it is not <br /> needed for access to the shore due to the presence of a bluff or steep slope. Also,the bridge would appear <br /> to function merely as an amenity to the property and does not provide necessary access to a portion of the <br /> property that is lacking accessibility because the property south of the creek can be accessed directly from <br /> the public roads in the immediate vicinity. There is also a concern that should the creek reach a level that <br /> would inundate the bridge of its underpinnings,the bridge could fail and be swept downstream and <br /> conceivably contribute to blockage of the culvert under Bayside Road,causing flooding. For all these <br /> reasons, Staff recommends that the proposed bridge not be allowed. <br /> The Planning Commission should consider the following issues: <br /> 1. Will the proposed home be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood? <br /> 2. What is the impact of the creek setback variance on hardcover? <br /> 3. How does the size of the proposed home impact location as it relates to the setback variances as <br /> well as the hardcover variances? <br /> 4. How may the hardcover impacts be offset? The applicants have proposed native plantings in <br /> conjunction with this project between the proposed home and the creek. <br /> Precedent has been set regarding approval of the requested lot area variances. The City routinely grants <br /> these types of requests when no other land is available for acquisition,the lot was legally created prior to <br /> adoption of the current zoning standards,and a house existing on the lot when the current zoning <br /> standards were adopted. <br /> Planning Staff recommends the following: <br /> 1. Denial of the hardcover variance and structural setback variance to allow the foot bridge. <br /> 2. Approval of the conditional use permit subject to the MCWD requirements for the stream bank <br /> stabilization and the City Engineer's recommendations. <br /> 3. Approval of the lot area variance conditioned upon the combination of the four lots into one tax <br /> parcel prior to the issuance of a building permit and compliance with the wetland buffer <br /> requirements. <br /> Page 5 <br />