My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 3017
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 3000 - 3099 (August 12, 1991 - March 30, 1992)
>
Resolution 3017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/17/2016 12:19:07 PM
Creation date
8/17/2016 12:19:07 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />CITYof ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. <br />3017 <br />A. The proposed 6.5' setback continues the existing <br />setback line of the house parallel with the side <br />lot line. No neighboring structures will be <br />adversely affected by continuing this encroachment <br />with a new addition. <br />B. A variance to allow 16.5% lot coverage where 15% <br />is normally allowed is justified due to the narrow <br />configuration of the lot and a lot area of only <br />0.38 acre in this 1.0 acre zoning district. <br />C. The Planning Commission finds no justification for <br />granting an increase in hardcover on the property, <br />but finds that the distance from the lake of the <br />proposed improvements helps to justify allowing <br />the existing 66.2% hardcover percentage to <br />continue. The narrow configuration of the lot and <br />the relatively small lot size are hardships which <br />justify granting of the proposed variances. The <br />fact that there is no existing hardcover in the 0- <br />75' or 75-250' zones is further justification for <br />allowing excess hardcover in the 250-500' zone. <br />4. The City Council has considered this application <br />including the findings and recommendations of the <br />Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by <br />the applicant and the effect of the variances on the <br />health, safety and welfare of the community. <br />5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on <br />this property are peculiar to it and do not apply <br />generally to other property in this zoning district; <br />that granting the variance would not adversely affect <br />traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard <br />or other danger to neighboring property; would not <br />merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is <br />necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or <br />;•. difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial <br />property right of the applicant; and would be in <br />keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code <br />and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />• Page 2 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.