My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 3096
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 3000 - 3099 (August 12, 1991 - March 30, 1992)
>
Resolution 3096
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/17/2016 12:01:59 PM
Creation date
8/17/2016 12:01:59 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
O� <br />• O O <br />b - CITY of ORONO <br />ti <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />�kESH0 NO_ 3096 <br />A RESOLUTION GRANTING <br />A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE <br />SECTION 10.28, SUBDIVISION 5 (B) <br />FILE #1719 <br />WHEREAS, Henry Brantingham (hereinafter "the <br />applicant") is owner of the property located at 3185 County Road <br />6 within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally <br />described as follows: <br />That part of the west 371.31 feet of the Northwest Quarter <br />of the Southwest Quarter of Section 28, Township 118 North, <br />Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, lying south of <br />the centerline of Hennepin County State Aid Highway Number <br />6, Plat 5, per Document Number 3844152. <br />• (hereinafter "the property"); and <br />WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a <br />variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 <br />(B) to permit the construction of the addition to the south side <br />of the existing residence. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of <br />Orono, Minnesota: <br />FINDINGS <br />1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1719. <br />2. The property is located in the RR -1B Zoning District. <br />3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application <br />on March 16, 1992, and recommended approval of the <br />proposed variance based upon the following findings: <br />A. The existing house does not meet the 50' rear lot <br />line setback and no other add-on space is <br />available for this structure. <br />B. Expansion is limited to the north by the septic <br />system and limited to the east and west by mature <br />• vegetation. The existing water supply well limits <br />expansion to the west also. <br />Page 1 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.