Laserfiche WebLink
6 <br /> u .� . i <br /> I <br /> � 1 <br /> � <br /> C�t o� ORONO � � <br /> _ l �' , <br /> • �� � � � � <br /> �:'�n`..,r..Fh;�^+ <br /> ' �� � RESOWTION OF THE CITY COUNCI L I <br /> -.:,�:„� <br /> -�y.;��.� :,�'�" NO. ��R <br /> ,. . • • <br /> �L^ <br /> A RESOLUTION GRANTING <br /> A CONDTIONAL DSE PERMIT <br /> PFR MUNICIPAL ZONING COD$ <br /> SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 19 AND <br /> S$CTION 10.55, SIIBDIVISION 9 (B3) AND <br /> VARIANCES TO MIINICIPAL ZONING CODE <br /> SSCTION 10.22, SQBDIVISION 2 AND <br /> � SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISION 8 <br /> FIL$ #1572 <br /> WH$REAS, Gunther and Gertrud Noexting (hereinafter "the <br /> appl.icants) are the owners of the property Xocated at 1060 Tonkawa <br /> Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City" ) and XegalXy � <br /> described as Lot l, Bxock l, Ryanwood, Hennepin County, Minnesota <br /> (hereinafter "property") ; and <br /> . WHEREAS, the appxicants have made app�.ication to the City of <br /> • Orono to permit the instaxXation of a permanent dock per MunicipaX <br /> Zoning Code Section 10. 03 , Subdivision 19 and Section 10.55 , <br /> Subdivision 9 (B3 ) and variances to Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and <br /> Section 10.55, Subdivision S to al.Xow excavation of the Xakeshore to <br /> permit the install.ation of support ties �to maintain 6' x 12' dock <br /> section cantixevered from Xakeshore bank; <br /> •� <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Councix of Orono, <br /> Minnesota: . <br /> � FINDINGS � <br /> 1. This appl.ication was reviewed as Zoning FiXe #1572. . <br /> � 2. The property is xocated in the LR-1B Single Famil.y Lakeshore <br /> ResidentiaX Zonin,g District requiring 1 acre in area. The <br /> property consists of approximateXy 1 acre in area. <br /> 3. The Orono Pl.annin�g Commission reviewed this appxication on <br /> August 20, 1990, and recommended approval. of the proposed <br /> variances and conditionaX use permit as proposed based on the <br /> foXXowing findings and hardship: <br /> a. The appl.icants propose no change in existing bank <br /> eXevations or for drainage. <br /> • Page 1 of 5 <br /> ` <br />