My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 2846
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 2800 - 2899 (May 18, 1990 - November 13, 1990)
>
Resolution 2846
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2019 2:23:27 PM
Creation date
8/17/2016 11:34:15 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�� <br /> • . . <br /> C�t� o� ORONO <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> � NO. 2846 <br /> • - • a� <br /> .. �''� � �s.+{ m. T p t'"' ,a <br /> 4; k f,' �,i <br /> A RESOLDTION GRANTING _,_n <br /> A VARIANCE TO _ <br /> MDNICIPAL ZONING CODE <br /> SECTION 10.23, SIIBDIVISION 6 (B) <br /> FII.S #1536 <br /> WHSREAS, Steve Gardiner (hereinafter "the applicant") is the <br /> owner of property located at 3770 Bayside Road within the City of <br /> Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: <br /> Lots l, 2 , 3 and 4, Ottoville, Hennepin County, Minnesota <br /> (hereinafter "the property"); and <br /> WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City of Orono for <br /> variances to Municipal Zoning Code Secttion 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) <br /> for additions to expand the second story of the existing structure <br /> located 3.4 ' from the north lot line where a 30' setback is normally <br /> required, and 20' from the west lot line where a 50' setback is <br /> normally required. <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Counci 1 of Orono, <br /> Minnesota: <br /> FINDINGS <br /> 1 . This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1536 . <br /> 2. The property is located in the LR-lA Single Family Lakeshore <br /> Residential Zoning District. <br /> 3. The Orono City Planning Commission reviewed this application <br /> on July 16 , 1990 and recommended approval of the proposed <br /> variance based upon the following findings: <br /> a. The applicant originally proposed additions to the <br /> footprint of the existing residence and proposed to expand <br /> the number of bedrooms in the house. The Planning <br /> Commission advised the applicant to revise that proposal <br /> based on the lack of capability to expand the sewage <br /> treatment system to serve those expansions. The applicant <br /> then submitted a revised proposal for remodeling and a <br /> lesser degree of expansion of the roof areas , yielding no <br /> additional bedrooms from the current one bedroom status. <br /> b. The Planning Commission finds that remodeling within <br /> the existing footprint and revision of the roof line to <br /> Page 1 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.