Laserfiche WebLink
�� <br /> • . . <br /> C�t� o� ORONO <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> � NO. 2846 <br /> • - • a� <br /> .. �''� � �s.+{ m. T p t'"' ,a <br /> 4; k f,' �,i <br /> A RESOLDTION GRANTING _,_n <br /> A VARIANCE TO _ <br /> MDNICIPAL ZONING CODE <br /> SECTION 10.23, SIIBDIVISION 6 (B) <br /> FII.S #1536 <br /> WHSREAS, Steve Gardiner (hereinafter "the applicant") is the <br /> owner of property located at 3770 Bayside Road within the City of <br /> Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: <br /> Lots l, 2 , 3 and 4, Ottoville, Hennepin County, Minnesota <br /> (hereinafter "the property"); and <br /> WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City of Orono for <br /> variances to Municipal Zoning Code Secttion 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) <br /> for additions to expand the second story of the existing structure <br /> located 3.4 ' from the north lot line where a 30' setback is normally <br /> required, and 20' from the west lot line where a 50' setback is <br /> normally required. <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Counci 1 of Orono, <br /> Minnesota: <br /> FINDINGS <br /> 1 . This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1536 . <br /> 2. The property is located in the LR-lA Single Family Lakeshore <br /> Residential Zoning District. <br /> 3. The Orono City Planning Commission reviewed this application <br /> on July 16 , 1990 and recommended approval of the proposed <br /> variance based upon the following findings: <br /> a. The applicant originally proposed additions to the <br /> footprint of the existing residence and proposed to expand <br /> the number of bedrooms in the house. The Planning <br /> Commission advised the applicant to revise that proposal <br /> based on the lack of capability to expand the sewage <br /> treatment system to serve those expansions. The applicant <br /> then submitted a revised proposal for remodeling and a <br /> lesser degree of expansion of the roof areas , yielding no <br /> additional bedrooms from the current one bedroom status. <br /> b. The Planning Commission finds that remodeling within <br /> the existing footprint and revision of the roof line to <br /> Page 1 of 4 <br />