My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 2834
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 2800 - 2899 (May 18, 1990 - November 13, 1990)
>
Resolution 2834
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/17/2016 11:27:35 AM
Creation date
8/17/2016 11:27:35 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7/ ' a <br /> - � . . <br /> � :�: , � , :.� C�t o� ORONO <br /> , � <br /> ,; :. - <br /> • ` � ' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> � � NO. 2834 <br /> • - • • <br /> B) The ,proposed 3-season porch and deck will continue <br /> the 2.8' setback along the left side lot line. The <br /> area of this porch had previously been granted a <br /> variance in 1976 for a deck in the same location. <br /> These additions are adjacent to an undeveloped alley, <br /> which contains City water lines but appears to be <br /> maintained as part of the yard of the neighboring <br /> property owner. <br /> C) Approval of the .variances will not increase the <br /> visual density in the neighborhood, since the nearest <br /> , neighboring structure is a detached garage 30' away on <br /> the other side of the .alley. . <br /> D) The proposed 2' cantilever over the front of the <br /> house, leaving a 16.8' street lot line setback, is <br /> generally in line with other residences constructed in • <br /> the neighborhood, hence granting the variance will not <br /> • result in a structure out of character with the rest of <br /> the neighborhood. <br /> E) Even with the proposed additions, the property will <br /> meet a1l �hardcover and 1ot coverage limitations. <br /> 4 . The City Council has considered this application <br /> including the findings and recommendations of the Planning <br /> Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant <br /> and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, <br /> safety and welfare of the community. <br /> 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on <br /> this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally <br /> to other property in this zoning district; that granting the <br /> variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, <br /> light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to <br /> neighboring property; would not merely serve as a <br /> convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate <br /> a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to <br /> preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and <br /> would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning <br /> Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> • Page 2 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.