Resolution 2808 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. 1 /, i K � � ; Cit o� ORONO � . � • �? RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL � NO. 2808 � • - • • 6. Lot l, Block 1 is proposed to continue its existing shared driveway access directly to Fox Street. Lots 2 and 3, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 2 are intended to be served by the existing private road within proposed Outlot C. 7. The private road outlot is proposed to be shown Outlot C on the plat, but, because the portion of that road which serves three or more houses has been recently paved, no upgrading of that road surface, nor construction of the actual cul-de-sac, is required until such time that Outlot B is proposed for development. At the time Outlot B is developed, the City Council shall determine the standards for road construction. 8. It is intended that the existing private road be privately owned and maintained. The City will require that the applicant execute the standard Road and Utility Easement over Outlot C, and shall execute the standard Declaration of Private Road Easement and Declaration for Maintenance of same. , 9 . The wetland within Lot l , Block 1 shall be subject to a • Conservation and Flowage Easement. � 10. Right-of-way of 33' shall be dedicated on the plat for existing City street known as Fox Street. 11. Outlots A and B each contain approximately 5 acres of dry buildable land in addition to wetlands, and are designated for future - development, requiring that access, lot standards and septic testing all be found acceptable by this or a future City Council before any development may occur on these two outlots. Flowage and Conservation Easements wi 11 �not be required over the ponds or wet lands in these outlots until future development occurs. 12. A variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (D) is required for the garage to remain in the front yard of Lot 3, Block 1. 13. Buildings including two garages and a small house within Lot 2, Block 1 are intended to be removed to accomodate the principal residence structure to be constructed on that property. 14. The existing tennis court within Lot 1, Block 1 does not meet the 50 ' setback required by Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03 Subdivision 14 (D). The rear lot line in question is not being revised as part� of this plat, hence it is appropriate to grant variances to allow this tennis court to remain within that substandard • setback until such time that the principal residence structure on this property is removed, at which time the tennis court would have to be removed. Page 2 of 5